Printable View
I'm writing a position paper on video game violence and the effects from playing them, and basicially I want to convey the message that they don't make normal people go ape shit and shoot people. But... doing my research I can't find a single god damn thing that is pro video game. Do you guys know of any articles or research that I could check out that says the crazy mothers are just that, crazy.
Appreciate it
~Mr. K~
i know someone did a kickass paper on this board once, i think it was master. and nice sig btw.
if only I could put that picture at the bottom of my paper....
~Mr. K~
It's going to be hard, I wish you good luck on your venture. Hell, you need good luck on just finding an article that is pro gaming.
http://www.steviemarsh.co.uk/pdzero/...s/violence.php
Closest to anything related I can find, not anything published, though.Quote:
Video Game Violence
I've killed hundreds of people. Men, women, good guys, bad guys, even animals. I always go for head shots, to really show them who is boss. To be really honest, killing people is just a fact of life for me.
Not real life of course, that would just be stupid. No I mean computer game life, a life where I can kill people, beat people about, pick my nose and do all kinds of bad stuff like that, without facing any of the consequences. In real life, however, things are different.
"I always go for headshots to
show them who is boss..."
Some Algebra...
Some bloke + big weaponry x innocent people = life imprisonment, or in some cases death.
Many games today feature violence (you all know the type: GTA, Carmageddon, Quake, Doom, Pac Man.) But can these games really make you a good killer? Do they make you want to smack your bitch up?
Possibly.
A recent survey showed that 4/5 children aged 13 or 14 play games intended for people aged 15 or more. Of this same group of children 4/5 played games intended for people aged 18 or more. This is a whopping 80% of children breaking the law.
Loads of research has been made into the actual effects of the games, most of which is biased or just plain crap, so I'll just sum it up: All children who play violent games turn violent. Doesn't sound likely to me, but there you go.
The public are the people that really matter in this situation, so here are some comments from them:
"Games occupy the youth of today, without them they may turn to crime."
MartyG
"Americans have access to guns and such, so the possibilities are immense. In the UK, though, it is nigh on impossible to get a good gun, so most info is irrelevant"
Stevie
"As a gamer I find it useful to take out all of my angst on games, rather than real people"
Disgracian
"People who carry out such acts in real life must have some psychological dysfunction beforehand"
Leech_uk_2000
"I thought the whole point was to take a break from reality"
Leech_uk_2000
"Violence is okay in games, but it needs to be kept under control"
Topsecretname
So, it seems that violence in games is endorsed by most of the people who play them, but what about the parents of such people?
"Most people can define what is reality and what is not. It is important that everyone is made fully aware of the consequences of violent actions in real life"
An anonomous parental figure.
From the quotes, It seems that most people support the games industry and agree with the content of the games. Why is it then, that the whole world is obsessed with blaming them for everything? Why do people claim that they can induce violence in the real world? These are questions that can never really be answered, although some things are very apparent. Games are just for fun, a way to take a break from reality. But attachment to what is real and what is not is essential when playing games. To some people this seems like an obvious comment, but to a few people around the world it is important to be like their gaming alter egos.
"Games are a way to take
a break from reality..."
But you, sitting here reading this. Did you kill real Russian guards after playing Goldeneye? Did you jump on people's heads after playing Mario 64? Did you eat ghosts after playing Pac Man? Thought not.
Yeah, I know a few, lemme see if I can find them.
Okay, some stuff by Henry Jenkins. He's a professor at MIT. He's very pro gaming. Maybe he has some stuff you can use.
http://members.tripod.com/gamesandpolitics/jenkins.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/featu...753613,00.html
A letter from a bunch of professors and stuff.
http://www.ncac.org/issues/aapviolenceltr.html
wtf is publicated?
Whatever material you find, be prepared for a less than stellar grade.
...some of these damn tottering old coot teachers around nowadays'll think ya silly for playing those "stupid games."
Good luck.
She already thinks I'm insane.
Even though I don't think that's the fact, earlier this year I wrote an essay about going to Otakon and how it "changed my life." It was a good essay and I just bullshitted the parts about the influence and life changing experiences. I just wanted to have an excuse to write about it. I got a 98, I think she took points off for the End of Evangelion description, HA!
~Mr. K~
Nothing published either.Quote:
Originally posted by Rich
...not anything publicated, though.
Here's a tip, the word "penis" enriches any paper.
Heh, sorry about that, meant to write published. All though it's not exactly a hard typo to distinguish from, don't know what the hell I was thinking.
There are many words that are acceptable in a good school report. The word "PENIS" is not one of them.