Printable View
Apparently, there are games based on the Playboy brand in the works for the PC, PS2, and Xbox where you have to re-create Hugh Hefner's Playboy empire and live the "Playboy lifestyle". :wtf: I assume that means hanging out in pajamas and banging Playboy hopefuls all day long. Or something.
http://gamespot.com/gamespot/stories...901485,00.html
Well, I hope it's better than Hooter's Road Trip. I wonder if it'll have boobies?
And no, this isn't an Acclaim game.
I actually thin it sounds fun. The idea of a sim-porn empire sounds like a decent premise.
It'll probably turn out to be a good game actually. The premise works well for a video game.
It's not it's the first Playboy game ever, or the first adult title...
shucks!!! i was really getting excited about the promotion for this one...Quote:
Originally posted by Dolemite
And no, this isn't an Acclaim game.
I wonder why people consider Playboy pornographic.
Only in the US can you talk, sing, and rap about fucking and drug use all you want but skin exposure is somehow worse than all of the above combined.
It's just tits. *yawn*
Porn=anything created for people to masturbate to. It's not about content, it's about intent.Quote:
Originally posted by dog$
I wonder why people consider Playboy pornographic.
*laughs* Shit, what isn't porn then?
http://www.jerkcity.com/jerkcity977.gif
Arush? Who the hell is that?
I was hoping for Tecmo...
That's truly amazing. You'd think after BMX XXX did so miserably, people would be trying to make games as different from anything Acclaim ever made as they possibly could...Quote:
Originally posted by Dolemite
And no, this isn't an Acclaim game.
I wonder why/how people can actually get excited when they see a person naked in a video game???
/me looks at his Playboy Karaoke Volume 4 for Sega Saturn...
Does it come with vaseline?
God I love Jerkcity... truly one of the most brilliant webcomics ever, and the one that validates the existance of webcomics when so many shite ones exist.
What's the difference between seeing them naked in a game and a magazine? At least in a game they're moving, even taking into account the low-poly nature of just about every single naked character in a game, ever.
Giants excluded. :)
Oh, and Jim Woodring called, he wants his art back. Unless he's actually associated with Jerk City and hid his name really well.
James
I said things made for that purpose. Just because you can or do masturbate over something doesn't make that its reason for existing.Quote:
Originally posted by dog$
*laughs* Shit, what isn't porn then?
All right.
Well, the reason why there are pictures of naked broads is because, through years of empirical study and research, it was determined that certain people will exchange money for pictures of naked broads. Therefore the reason it exists is for profit.
Now what?
Porno Tycoon!
DOAXBV! :lol:
Quote:
Originally posted by dog$
I wonder why people consider Playboy pornographic.
Only in the US can you talk, sing, and rap about fucking and drug use all you want but skin exposure is somehow worse than all of the above combined.
It's just tits. *yawn*
Who said that tits are a bad thing? ;)
Wasn't there a Playboy title for the Playstation? I guess with the BMX XXX inclusion they figure now would be the good time to input a fully functional game with nudity in it. It does actually sounds like a decent concept, like people said above.
It's all in the execution however, all in the execution. I wonder if it'll have the dark drug lifestyle in the game as well ;). I'm guessing not.