Re: Re: Pocket Gaming with PDAs
Quote:
Originally posted by Six
The new OS5 (Sony NX & Tungsten) units have the highres screens and power that you "need" in a PDA. The pocketPC units approach the PDA more like a PC - more of anything is always better - which accounts for their increased power processors and memory, IMHO.
I'm from the camp that renounces such utitlity devices as a PDA for use in anything more serious than Bejeweled or similar time wasters. Any serious gaming on a PDA would require an entire overhaul of the input systems. Granted there are "controller accessories" (
Sony controller accessory) that attempt the replicate a gamepad, but my experiences with them have been disappointing at best.
Again, see the new units from Palm
Tungsten and Sony
Sony NX Series or
the new NZ series are competing with the PocketPCs in terms of color/graphical resolution and processing power. In addition there are some new models from HP that cater to the lower end market of PocketPC users like the
HP h1910. Things are looking good for both the Palm (more power) and PocketPC (affordability) sides.
Again I think that this is misleading ;) My Sony NX60 can play Mpeg and Mp3, comes with a headphone/remote set for the mp3 player function, has a larger highres screen and has processing power to spare for games. I just didn't purchase my Palm unit or my cell phone with the gaming aspect in mind - it's not what they were designed for IMHO.
I think that until thought in the design aspect is given to gaming the PDA game scene won't be going beyond the state it is in now.
I gotta go eat. Just my $0.02
#6
I'd just like to note that I sell Palms/Pocket PCs for a living, so I have to stare at the Tungsten's/Clie's screen at least a few minutes a day while I'm selling them to customers. The screens are EXTREMELY nice.....for Palm handhelds. Compare the screens to a newer HP/Compaq/Toshiba, and you'll notice a huge difference.
And just to clarify, I'm not saying "Go out and buy a PDA to play games on, the controls are spot on and it's great and fun and stuff!". I just wanted to let people know that you CAN play some extremely sweet 3D games, as well as some classics, on PDAs.
Quote:
Originally posted by DArque Bishop
Hrm.
I have two PDA's right now... a Handspring Visor Pro, and a Handspring Visor. Like the Sony PDA's, they run PalmOS. The Pro is actually my primary PDA; the original Visor is kept at home w/o batteries in case anything should happen to the Pro. I also have a VisorPhone attachment for the Visors, which let them act as my cell phone. If I leave the house, the PDA's coming with me.
That said, other than a copy of SolFree (Solitaire), I have absolutely no games on my Visors, and I don't plan on getting any. These devices are purely for function IMHO; if I want to have anything more than a quick cardgame if I'm out and about, I'll take my GBA with me. I just don't see the point unless you have something that's actually designed for gaming. Quake on a PocketPC? Yuck.
(BTW, for the record, andyrose, you're probably one of the very few people I've met who prefers PocketPC devices to Palms. I guess it's a matter of personal preference; at where I work, you almost never see PocketPC's anymore. Those who have had them have since switched to Handspring or Palm devices.)
Edit: There's also one other point I should bring up... there's no real point bringing up that the PocketPC devices are more powerful than their PalmOS-based bretheren, because unless I'm mistaken, PocketPC 2002 requires more powerful hardware to run on than PalmOS does. :)
Actually, the processor is extremely important. Especially when talking about GAMING. Quake doesn't run well at all on anything but an ARM processor(or something more recent/more powerful). I think it was worth mentioning, at least.
Quote:
Such comparisons can backfire; we have two production proxy servers at the office running MS Windows 2000 Server w/ MS ISA proxy software, and so far my test proxy server running Red Hat Linux 8.0 w/ Squid 2.5 STABLE1 proxy software is going as fast (if not faster) than the production servers... and the test server's processor speed and memory is about half that of the production servers. :)
Just my $.02...
But do you use your servers to play games? Because that's what I was hinting at when discussing the processor speed. :p
Re: Re: Re: Pocket Gaming with PDAs
Quote:
Originally posted by andyrose
I'd just like to note that I sell Palms/Pocket PCs for a living, so I have to stare at the Tungsten's/Clie's screen at least a few minutes a day while I'm selling them to customers. The screens are EXTREMELY nice.....for Palm handhelds. Compare the screens to a newer HP/Compaq/Toshiba, and you'll notice a huge difference.
And just to clarify, I'm not saying "Go out and buy a PDA to play games on, the controls are spot on and it's great and fun and stuff!". I just wanted to let people know that you CAN play some extremely sweet 3D games, as well as some classics, on PDAs.
I agree with the difference in the screens, but I don't see it as being quite a "huge" difference. :) I'll try to do a thorough screen comparison tonight at work (since business has hit the after Christmas slump) though I won't deny that the Toshiba has a really nice screen - bright with wonderful color. But to me it all comes down to ease of OS use, software support and compatibility (with friends and associates PDAs - most of which own mid to low end Palm machines).
I didn't think that you *were* claiming the PDA as the Gameboy killer (I don't think any sane individual would), I just wanted to state my experiences with PDA games - though my PPC gaming has been minimal. I need to try Tomb Raider and Quake before I give up completely and should probably shut up until I do :sweat:
I don't know.
#6