If so, dude you proved most of my points in that thread yourself.
Printable View
If so, dude you proved most of my points in that thread yourself.
That's what I thought - you won't. And specify which most of your points. You were right about the SCUD issue only (I'll take the Pentagon's word for it than yours any day), so therefore everything else you said is true too?? I don't think so - I think being wrong on so many points with such arrogance constitutes humiliation on your end... The Pentagon is being reported on FOX as claiming they've yet to find any WMDs, SCUDs, and that any have been used, etc. (they're going by the Pentagon, not contradicting foreign reports). So, there goes your claim of them being nothing but propoganda. They reported on Iran early this morning, along with 7 (which now is reduced to 5) oil well fires, and your other bullshit prediction about claiming to know they'll definitely cover up civilian casualty counts is just that.. bullshit... Again, you saw fit to demonize the US media for your own agenda - that's what's aggravating to me... Ready and waiting to pounce on the slightest inconsistencies or mistakes. The damn war is still going on, I don't expect 100% reporting accuracy 100% of the time - you apparently seem to. Others were saying they were al-samud missiles, so... But, the Pentagon just cleared up any confusion, so there. You pounced on the SCUD issue because you really really wanted it to be wrong... That's what I infer.
Yeah, whoops... The Pentagon claiming no SCUDs or WMDs were used up until now nullifies your point (as well as proving the reports that stated/confirmed they were scuds wrong).. You just kept rushing and rushing to prove something wrong or right. And in this case, it's to objectively defend and vindicate Saddam Hussien of weapons violations. But don't think I would've believed you at this point if it hadn't come from the Pentagon.Quote:
Originally posted by Almaci
Of course the US army wll say they are scuds, they need justification.
And no, actually, the Pentagon/Fox proved MOST of your points wrong on US media in that thread which I outlined above btw.Quote:
Originally posted by Almaci
If so, dude you proved most of my points in that thread yourself.
But wait, according to you, they're nothing but propoganda, so maybe I shouldn't believe them either even though they're in agreement with others... Damn.Quote:
Originally posted by Almaci
Hooray for propaganda and cheerleading, so much for fair and unbiased reporting.
Kinda sums up Fox, especially now.
Jimmy Carters? ... there are doubles? Where is the other Jimmy Carter on this forum? It is time for me to unleash my wrath. If there is someone else posting as Jimmy Carter, I will hunt them down and force them to listen to "Cry Me A River" by Justin Timberlake until they stop their heinous deeds and defiling my name with retardness.Quote:
Originally posted by Almaci
Anyways, more proof of Jimmy Carters retardnes,
This is silly, lets go to a chatroom or something
Yeah make fun of my spelling all you want, doesnt change youre level of toolnes(I invented another word wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee).Quote:
Originally posted by Jimmy Carter
Jimmy Carters? ... there are doubles? Where is the other Jimmy Carter on this forum? It is time for me to unleash my wrath. If there is someone else posting as Jimmy Carter, I will hunt them down and force them to listen to "Cry Me A River" by Justin Timberlake until they stop their heinous deeds and defiling my name with retardness.
You're just jealous.Quote:
Originally posted by Almaci
toolnes.
Bah.
I've lost faith in the youth. I just saw someone WRITE OUT "lol" in a card. The internet DOES make one stupid.
...and, once again, I may support the war, but I don't see the point to bickering about it on the internet anymore.
The moment I see you post in flawless Turkish is when your criticism takes on the slightest degree of relevance.Quote:
Originally posted by Stone
(Or, what, is it again bad form to point out Almaci's shitty command of the English language? By doing so, am I just putting myself at Almaci's level? Should I have taken Almaci's tack and just written something like "there yuo go avoiding all jimmys points and just insulting"?)
Oh, come on, sleeveboy - Almaci was being an ass (and not even being creative about it), and you've got to admit there's something a bit off about using the word "retardnes" to insult someone's intelligence. You know, it'd be like me calling Almaci "a bad spellar" or saying that "he cant speak no english good grammar", that sort of thing - not quite as poignant, since, yes, yes, spelling ability has nothing to do with intelligence, but, hey, nonetheless.Quote:
Originally posted by sleeveboy
The moment I see you post in flawless Turkish is when your criticism takes on the slightest degree of relevance.
And, the moment TNL becomes The Nextyakataturk Levelukturk (or what have you), and not an English-speaking gaming forum will be when I'll have to start exercising my flawless Turkish skills.
I merely took issue with your mockery of Almaci's command of the English language, which was bad form considering he is not a native speaker.
On the rest of your post I offer no comment.
Regarding whether Iraq has yet used any weapons for which we are invading their country:Quote:
Originally posted by YellerDog
However, there are still issues about this whole thing. Where are these weapons of mass destruction? Where was our evidence? What's our justification in all of this?
And moreover, if no weapons are found, how is this going to effect our position with the UN, not to mention the rest of the world? If we do find our smoking gun, that's one thing; but what if we don't?
"Mr. President, are you surprised the enemy has not used any weapons of mass destruction?" -reporter
"I am thankful the enemy has not used any weapons of mass destruction." -Pres. Bush
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/23/spr...ipt/index.html
:lol:
Regarding the implications for the US when we don't find anything:
"...if we go into Iraq and when we're through, we can demonstrate that what we said was there is there. Then they're going to shut up. Now if we go in there and we don't find anything, then we'll have egg all over our faces." -fmr. Sec. State Lawrence Eagleburger
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0303/18/cf.00.html
:rolleyes: