Since so many people in the Hardcover vs Softcover debate seemed to want it, here it is. Apologies to all.
James
Printable View
Since so many people in the Hardcover vs Softcover debate seemed to want it, here it is. Apologies to all.
James
I voted Softcore.
Hardcore is base and uninteresting, as it simply shows the act in all "literalness". With softcore, you still get to engage your imagination.
edit: Then again, I'm not totally sure what we're talking about, so I may be way off there :sweat:
Hmmmmm...Softcore. I suppose.
Without a girl gagging on a load of cum it's just weak.
Hardcore Porn of course, I hate porn movies that are cut so you can't see anything, that sucks.
That's not softcore. That's called censoring.
Softcore is where nothing goes in the poon.
I still consider spliced porn Softcore though, even though it's not exactly the technical definiton.
Softcore. Hardcore usually ends up looking like a medical procedure or a how-to-make-babies brochure. That and it's just generally pretty degrading to watch. I like to have a little bit of taste, and perhaps even emotion, in what I look at or watch.
Hardcore, seeing a woman hump a guys stomach trying to make it look real doesnt do anything for me.
I should mention that if the bumpin' is simulated, it had better be tasteful and well-done. Usually it just looks silly. I'd rather see hardcore or just the girl by herself than silly simulated stuff.