The 700 Club

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jimmy Carter
Intelligence in its natural, raw, unbridled form. How would many of us have been able to choose either one of the assholes as a leader when we would've been too young to do so?

Me? They do not represent me. They don't represent most Christians. Just like pop music doesn't represent most people on this message board or the music buying public. Being that Eminem is the most popular, or was, music artist, wouldn't that mean that we could say that we all elevated him to that level? Even the people who didn't buy the CDs? After all, we're all music buying people.

But both you and I know that it doesn't work. I didn't buy his CD. You probably didn't buy his CD. In fact, his best selling CD only went 7 x Platinum. 7,000,000 CDs sold to 280,000,000 people. So, you cannot possibly blame the whole of 280,000,000 people when only 2.5% of the population bought the disc, now can you?

The same goes for Christian TV preacher jerks. Being that Christianity takes up 84% of the population (CIA World Factbook 2002, combining Protestant and Catholic numbers, some probably unpracticiing but admitting), 235,000,000, to judge the entire religion based on assholes who attract a few million people is idiocy. And if we want to take worldwide numbers on the issue, it gets even more ridiculous.

So in the end, your blaming the popularity and position of a few men on the entire mass is indicative of zero thought on the subject. That every practicing Christian is somehow responsible for the production and placement of people like Falwell, Robertson and Bakker is beyond flawed. If your logic were correct, then every single one of us is responsible for the popularity and position of Eminem, Titanic and George W. Bush. Because, after all, we're all Americans. I mean- you could have bought Radiohead, Reservoir Dogs and voted for Al Gore. You didn't want the winners in the positions that they got into. But they did. And without use of the majority, even.

---

Thank you.

My point (before I had to reboot) was that Shine isn't differentiating between accountability and guilt by association. Saying that all Christians are responsible for RObertson is like saying all gamers are responsible for Columbine, or that all Catholics are to blame for child molesting priests.

If I had done something to put Robertson in power, then I would admit it. But considering that I've done nothing to support him and I've done many things to oppose him, I resent being personally blamed for his rise to power.

That is all I have to say.

Meh, he obviously has no place with the name of God. His heart is hate filled with malice.

I believe in God, and believe he is the most misinterpreted and misunderstood things of all time.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by CynicalSphere
Hmmmm, that may be part of it but I'm also inclined to add that Robertson shelled out money to create Trinity Broadcast Network (affectionately known by me as The Blasphemous Network) before he sold it to Rupert Murdoch for a nice chunk o' change. That's media exposure right there, regardless.

---

Actually, it was CBN (Christian Broadcasting Network) that Murdoch bought and transformed to Fox Family. Murdoch and partner Haim Saban sold it to ABC/Disney/CapCities for an insane amount of profit.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Lhadatt
Actually, it was CBN (Christian Broadcasting Network) that Murdoch bought and transformed to Fox Family. Murdoch and partner Haim Saban sold it to ABC/Disney/CapCities for an insane amount of profit.

---

Oh, it was? I guess I heard wrong (someone told me verbally and my hearing isn't exactly pristine). CBN and TBN sound a lot alike under those circumstances...

TBN is still around. Try tuning to broadcast channel 14.

I don't think those weirdos will ever sell out. The pink haired lady will be around until 2534 or something.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Nick
Hero, define "radical conformist," and maybe I can help you.

I will say this: the reason Christians are predominately represented by nutjobs is honestly because these guys know their Bibles inside and out. The religion is founded on aggression to those who are not Children of God. You can drag out "God is love," and I can drag out "Depart from me ye cursed," and we can keep going till you run out of uplifting phrases fairly early on. The Scripture promises damnation for pretty much everyone, so don't act so surprised when you hear a Christian on TV criticizing homosexuality, Islam, unwed mothers, etc., etc. Just be surprised Christians have gotten so soft.

---

:bs:
the reason that flawell is found as are reprsentative of the christian faith is because he has used his business acumen and ability to rally wealthy people with extreme points of view to help finance his media conglomerates. Extremists have found high positions in just about EVERY political and social institution, and those who are used as spokes men are seldom the best representatives of the said group. Those given access to the media are those who will make "Good Television". the fact that he "knows the bibles inside and out" has nothing to do with the his ability to gain power, i personally know 3people who can quote verse and chapter from memory, and 2 of them work in a deli, so growth in power is not based on that criteria..

Now for the nonsense that christianity is founded on agression,good ol nick, that is utterbull. You can quote old testiment verese at me till the sun comes out,and it still will not be a represetative of the beliefs of christians. The new testiment is the outline for the behaviors of a christian,and if you can see the part where Jesus specifically tells us to attack or strike another human, i will send you a lollypop. if there are comments that GOD will damn or condemn a person, we are never instructed to take justice into our own hands and do like wise. In fact,the well known parable of the woman accused of adultry by the crowd specifically discourages it. Actually tobe specific, the scripturesonly promise damnation for those who are given the word and reject it,in short, you have to choose damnation,so spare me the "promise of damnation" bull, you make your own choice,deal with it.

I am certianly no fan of Roberts or fallwell, since they are certainly no fans of catholicism, but i certainly dont see them as any worse than patricia ireland,or al sharpton, or my favorite bigot,Madylen Murry O'Hare.Its a question of perspective.

Oh,and the darwin/hitler link does exist, Hitler's ideas of genetic superiority was similar to those of the Scientifc movement of "Eugenics" Which sought to apply the darwinian idea of natural seleiton to social engeneering, to "improve" humanity through selective breeding.Hitler actually won an award form the eugenics society for his treatment of the mentally ill(which was not particularly different from his treatment of jews or the gay...)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Lhadatt
TBN is still around. Try tuning to broadcast channel 14.

I don't think those weirdos will ever sell out. The pink haired lady will be around until 2534 or something.

---

We don't get cable out here. We have a satellite but I haven't watched it in forever. Got tired of muddling through all those channels only to find nothing worth watching, heheh.

But yeah, it seems that TBN is still around; I guess our satellite provider either dropped it or I just haven't seen it on there in a long time. I don't actively look for it because I like to pretend it doesn't exist, heheh.

Not satellite, broadcast. :) They're on 14 in a large number of areas in America.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by frostwolf ex
Oh,and the darwin/hitler link does exist, Hitler's ideas of genetic superiority was similar to those of the Scientifc movement of "Eugenics" Which sought to apply the darwinian idea of natural seleiton to social engeneering, to "improve" humanity through selective breeding.Hitler actually won an award form the eugenics society for his treatment of the mentally ill(which was not particularly different from his treatment of jews or the gay...)

---

Your grammar is appalling, but I will try to make a comment here. It's not really Darwin's problem that Hitler used his theories to fuck up the world. It doesn't make Darwin any less correct or anything. Hitler's ideas seem to be a flawed extension of Darwin, but that doesn't mean Darwin = Hitler. You could use induction to prove that every single person in the world is named Steve, but all that means is that YOUR assumptions are incorrect (and this was actually a problem in one of my math classes).

I mean, Im sure you knew that, but I just want to make that statement, as much in response to Pat Robertson or Falwell as you.

I had to endure this shite to get in good with a christian girl way back when. Was the sex worth it? Combined with the sheer humor that man gave me, god yes.

Leykis and Stern have nothing on Robertson for sheer humor.