I think I got it...The man had NO eyes but he had one eye! So the tree had one apple and he removed one apple instead of two! So theres an apple but not no apples!
Printable View
I think I got it...The man had NO eyes but he had one eye! So the tree had one apple and he removed one apple instead of two! So theres an apple but not no apples!
That's creative ^-^, SearchManX, but no cigar.
NICE Soundwave. You got it! I dunno if he cheated...he may have, but who can say for sure? So...Soundwave gets 2 points?
He cheated.
Bah, I finally get it. Stupid play on words. I still think the answer is BS.
I agree. If it's a play on words, it should at least make sense. And the way it's phrased... it doesn't make sense if you read it with that meaning in mind. You know what I mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by SiKrAiKeN
I should get points for creativity. -_-
nope. I had to break down the riddle.. I tried using math to figure it out and teh only way it made sense =Quote:
Originally Posted by Lobo
No eyes /= 0 eyes ergo 1 eye
No apples /= 0 apples ergo 1 apple
hence teh ability to see. Someone mentioned the semantics before and I figured it out.
My head really hurts.
*grins* I told you you'd get it, SiKrAiKeN ;). Don't be mad, at least everyone knows the answer. And I think it's very satisfactory. (Psst - Calliander, me and my wiffle bat are gonna be waiting for you to come home, darling.)
The tree had one apple... how could he remove two???Quote:
So the tree had one apple and he removed one apple instead of two!
EDIT: Blah... nevermind...
I count 4 more posts until he gets a point.