Originally Posted by NightWolve
You're quite welcome :). It aggravated me abit so I was forced to respond :P.
Maybe it will, maybe it won't. You were perhaps expecting instant results? Right now, having one less uncertainty, his whereabouts, IS a good thing. Baath Loyalists, if in the fight, may be somewhat demoralized. I'm uncertain either way, but you seem to be certain none of 'em are Baath Loyalists fighting for Saddam. Right then, they're all just nationalists fighting against the imperialist occupier... That would explain them sabotaging their own oil pipelines and power plants. Really looking out for their fellow Iraqi countrymen there...
I mean, some Iraqis can at least express relief; less fear of reprisals, which in turn could increase their cooperation... If it doesn't change, hell, it doesn't change... The troops will have to work harder at cracking down on those responsible for the attacks. Their morale will at least go up...
Well, don't forget to remind everyone we once worked with him... Of course, Russia and France's hands are clean, it's just us. I mean, it would only be the 100th time I've read that from you and Almaci... Has that been some kind of attempt to hold the current president Bush accountable for past American foreign policy? Or does that attempt to take away from the fact Russia and France were his partners in the here and now, so us calling them on it makes us hypocrites? I dunno, is Bush not allowed to reverse a past policy of supporting a scumbag because what? That would be hypocrisy? What, him having done this it's upsetting because of the inconsistency it creates in ~20 years of American foreign policy? I'm just really curious as to your motives for posting that. We did boot him from Kuwaitt, so it's not like there was a concern we'd be "buddies" with him again. If the motive is the hope that the US never repeats such policy decisions, then fine, it's commendable and I'm just overreacting. But you bring it up when this current president is doing the exact opposite. It's like, are you then complimenting Bush for the action of deposing Saddam and not "partnering" with him? You see why it gets confusing...
Gee, SC, ya know, many mass-murderers around the world never really did anything to me personally or this country (which I disagree with about Iraq), but that doesn't seem to prevent me from expressing happiness at their demise ;). It's confusing though, you say not as happy as the rest of us. How "happy" do you think we are? It just seems like you can't lay down your ideological opposition for a second, even with the fact that a ruthless mass-murderer will hopefully never be able to hurt anyone again. I suppose I'd have to walk in your shoes to understand that...
Some yes, some no... I don't know how one arrives at "a lot" or any figure for that matter. So, this is what bothers you about his capture? Who cares if they're happy for reasons you don't like; an evil dictator IS out of the way. Unless of course it turns out to be his body-double ;). Anyway, even if we found the WMDs, I doubt you would be satisfied regarding "justification." I think you simply lay that argument out to change the mind of those that supported the war... But man, one day of no nitpicking was just not possible it seems.
Well, I'm ready to give up on trying to understand your response man. And, I really don't get how you could say being an Iranian has nothing to do with it. You've brought up that the US once partnered with him, which was against Iran, but you seem to express more resentment against the US than him. That fact must make it more personal for you, I would think...
Alright, so, you suppose it's a good thing if it leads to Americans getting back to more important things? And so, if it doesn't, it's not that much of a good thing? :) That is of course a great benefit to his capture, but I dunno, the condition of "getting back to more important things" you're placing to qualify it as a "good thing" doesn't seem right. That's a benefit, not a condition to me... It's as simple as he's one less scumbag out of power.
Really, I think you're just trying to downplay the significance of it cause of Bush. Your indifference is odd. Well, whatever, I'm exhausted of this now ;). I think after all the arguing on this board before and after war started, I lost some of the enjoyment I'd feel now... Almaci's endless ranting, second guessing, bickering, bumping of 5 war-related topics in one day, etc. worked in devalueing what simply should be a happy day. Not to mention the rest of the anti-war ppl in media... If that was the goal, it worked to an extent. You can't feel that much happiness with all the apathy, pessimism, gloom and doom, snickering that they produced (assuming you had time to follow the news alot)... I really can't help but agree with Yoshi's response... Why depose ruthless genocidal dictators if you're gonna produce relentess anti-war protesters around the world like that? That block traffic, block supplies to troops, argue every fucking day of their miserable fucking life, exhausting/aggravating/agitating the fuck out of everyone else? The threat posed to ppl's sanity around the world is greater than what Saddam did, frankly ;). No, I changed my mind, it is a bittersweet day.