Some very interesting Sasquatch/Bigfoot photos

So as I mentioned in the past the study of Bigfoot is really interesting to me, and I've read many books etc on the subject. Here is an Ohio based Bigfoot site, some of the pictures are interesting, but many are just too vauge. The whole part about a Bigfoot that smiles and babies in tress seem a bit too far fetched, even for me. I'm inclined to believe that alot of the pictures contain nothing but blobs/eniviroment, natural things that aren't bigfoot. On the other hand some of them had to be flat out hoaxes or the real deal.

http://www.angelfire.com/co4/OBSC/page1.html

I think Bigfoot is blurry. That's the problem.

I think it's temporarily unavailable. Teh conspiracy.

I think Korian should stop making these threads.

I can't wait until we forget about Sasquatches and Aliens and the Loch Ness Monster and come up with a new mythical creature to take poor blurry pictures of...

NONE OF THEM ARE REAL. BIGFOOT DOESN'T EXIST.

Jesus.

It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. That's extra scary to me. He's a live, out of focus monster roaming the countryside. Run, he's fuzzy.

I fear nature photographers more than I do Bigfoot. Who knows what they might catch me in the act of doing? I go to the woods for SOLITUDE, not a photo op.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by omfgninjas

I think Bigfoot is blurry. That's the problem.

---

So I suppose bigfoot would look normal to Jeremy?

Oh my, how embarassing.

Those pics are me streaking, I'm a hairy little fellow.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 680x0

So I suppose bigfoot would look normal to Jeremy?

---

:lol:

So wrong yet so funny...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by omfgninjas

It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. That's extra scary to me. He's a live, out of focus monster roaming the countryside. Run, he's fuzzy.

---

Mitch Hedberg?