Printable View
Fuck you, you gimp Spider-Man was the fucking majestic boner that Marvel needed in the movie circuit to break the flaccid streak it had going on. Until Spider-Man decided to ejaculate his webbing all over the faces of your loved ones, Marvel didn't have shit that was worth going to the movies for.
Choke on that web-spooge.
How is Spiderman fluff and not Ironman? I'm still conflicted if Spiderman2 or Ironman is my fav comic book movie.
I like Spider-Man 2 quite a bit (Steve Ditko overdrive), but Iron Man doesn't have the story problems that SM2 has.
I'd bang Pepper Potts over Mary Jane.
Leslie Bibb's reporter chick >>> Pepper Potts
Listen fanfucktastic, the movie was light and fluffy. Iron man is a man's movie, Spiderman is for emo teens and pussies that never had their balls drop when they grew up. Marvel does suck as a movie company and overall they continue too, Iron man does not instantly reverse all past sins. I didn't say it sucked. I said it was light and short, like your fucking wang homo. In the end, it didn't mean anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor Ramon
But as far as movies that don't mean anything goes, its tops.
Fuckface.
lol .. YAWA wins. Holy shit that was hilarious.
ha ha, thats was a good one
and The Punisher (1989) is Marvel's best work....EVER!
lol. Spiderman 1, Ironman, and Darknight are practically the same movie. The only difference is teenager, happy billionaire, sad billionaire. One is fluff because the main character is in high school? The plots are exactly the same with the same character progression.