:lol: I put VH there twice :lol:
I ofcourse ment KB.
And to speak Vandal Hearts was more entertaining than Van Helsing.
Printable View
:lol: I put VH there twice :lol:
I ofcourse ment KB.
And to speak Vandal Hearts was more entertaining than Van Helsing.
I agree with that 100%. Vandal Hearts is one of my all-time favorite games ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by Despair
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshine
It's sad the best part of the movie happened ten minutes into it.
In no way is Van Helsing better than Kill Bill.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkCrow676
Blade had a bunch of peons that evaporate on contact whereas VH's villains could take a pounding before they died. I'd say that evens out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Despair
Sooo... pretty much what you're saying is that because Van Helsing didn't directly kill every creature they don't count as deaths? I don't follow.Quote:
Well, VH directly killed only 1 bride, 1 werwolf, few Gremlin babies and couple of midgets. Plus Mr Hyde and Dracula. Thats all.
Rest of the kills were either situational (ala trap in carriage, which would have been cooler, if it was triggered in mid air, when Bride opened the door, and not wait until it fell and exploded), and situational death of 3rd bride, when Anna got the stake right in time (another overused cliche).
As for first Wolfmen, you dont even see him die. They just pretty much fell of the cliff and thats it. Same goes for Igor's lame death.
I'd actually have to say VH was crappier as an actual movie but far more entertaining. KB had a lot of slow extra scenes more like a TV series looking for padding then a tightly done movie, and I've had no want to see it again since I did the first time in theaters. It was good and all but I still don't care that I have yet to see part 2, which says a lot about how much of a mark it left on me. Compare that to me already wanting the VH DVD and I think you can tell where I stand on the matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshine
But then, I also found Ong-Bak more entertaining then KB and I can't understand a damn thing they're saying in that movie.
Those waiting to see KB Vol. 2, I say see it. It really is a great movie, even if the first one was a bunch of grab-ass.
Heh. Actually, that whole Star Wars thing was very uncharacteristic of me. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolemite
I can't see anything entirely redeemable in Van Helsing other than maybe the Van Helsing character himself and the friar sidekick. Kill Bill 2 is one of the films of the year and Kill Bill 1 was one of the best of last year.Quote:
Originally Posted by MechDeus
Everything from the camera work to the acting to the fight sequences to the story was superior in Kill Bill.
Grab ass? Explain.Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Vegetable
Grab-ass = a bunch of crap/garbage/junk/ridiculousness/filth/disappointment/grab-ass.
Also known as "clutch-butt."
Examples:
"Man, that Sega announcement about the Matrix was a bunch of grab-ass."
"Kill Bill Vol. 1 is a bunch of grab-ass."
That new Catwoman movie looks like trash, man." Yeah, I know. What a bunch of grab-ass."
etc.
Hey then Van Hellsing fits nicely into this description CV :p
So.... then you're just wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Vegetable
I have no problem with somebody like you or MechDeus enjoying Van Helsing more than Kill Bill. I really don't care because it's your personal amusement while watching a movie. What is silly is when you'll call a movie a bunch of crap/garbage/junk/ridiculousness/filth/disappointment/grab-ass without pointing out specifics so I can refute them.
You may not have liked Kill Bill. But nobody who knows about film can say Van Helsing is a better movie than Kill Bill while keeping a straight face.