Anti-Gay Marriage Constitutional Amendments?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by burgundy

I'll back that. I don't see any benefit that has come from secularizing marriage.

---

I would however support an amendment banning shitty homocentric television programming aimed at the mainstream. Queer Eye, Queer as Folk, the gay-based reality show premiering next week on FOX and absolutely anything involving Ellen Degeneres that isn't Finding Nemo all totally fucking suck.

---

I second the banning of Queer Eye. Seriously, they went out of their way to make sure the gay dudes were standard stereotypes. It is like the blaxploitation of the 21st century.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by burgundy

I'll back that. I don't see any benefit that has come from secularizing marriage.

---

Marriage is already secularized.

What I'm against is the exclusive, religious-izing of marriage.

And fuck you both, Queer Eye is a great show.

Gay Marriage/SI Swimsuit Cross-post:
"Religion is the opiate of the masses." - Karl Marx

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sleeveboy

And fuck you both, Queer Eye is a great show.

---

And thus all your opinions are deemed worthless.

Queer as Folk is great. Sometimes. :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kenshin

Gay Marriage/SI Swimsuit Cross-post:
"Religion is the opiate of the masses." - Karl Marx

---

cross forum trolling since they took down cka's 2 strikes rule
"Canada sucks"-just about everyone who isnt a canadian in denial.

Straight guys have no style.

Gay guys do.

Gay guys show straight guys some style.

I dont see what the problem is here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sleeveboy

Marriage is already secularized.

What I'm against is the exclusive, religious-izing of marriage.

---

So if you take away the religious definition of marriage, then what is it? What more is it in a secularized society then two people pooling thier resources, whether it be to raise children, because they like each other, to increase resources, or even to gain political power.

Of course the ease of divource has greatly weaken what marriage is truely meant to be anyway.

Still, tell me why two college roommates (could be either sex) couldn't have a marrige of convenience during their time in school and then separate and then go through the same thing with someone else. (Once again in the gov. eyes).

All, in all, marriage should likely be dropped by government and replaced by a civil union system for anyone who wan't to pool their resources. The vows or love or anything would be needed. Just fill out some forms then you'd be good to go.

Then there's still the question of whether it should be limited to two people or not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sleeveboy

Marriage is already secularized.

What I'm against is the exclusive, religious-izing of marriage.

And fuck you both, Queer Eye is a great show.

---

I know it's already secularized. I just don't see what good secularization does society.

And yeah, it's good if you need five gays to tell you how to match your socks, I guess.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by diffusionx

Straight guys have no style.

Gay guys do.

Gay guys show straight guys some style.

I dont see what the problem is here.

---

I don't know. If they have all the style, why do we get all the pussy?

because theyre gay.