If you agree that this shit doesn't belong in the Constitution regardless of your stance on the issue then you shouldn't be offended by what sleeve posted.
Printable View
If you agree that this shit doesn't belong in the Constitution regardless of your stance on the issue then you shouldn't be offended by what sleeve posted.
I was almost shocked when I saw G.W.'s pompous announcement on TV. Sure he's the President, but that shouldn't give him the right to basically cast judgement on homosexual couples. In my opinion, the ideal marriage is one based on the love between two people, whether or not that love is between two people of the same or different sex makes no difference to me. Right now, straight people have done plenty to ruin the sanctity of marriage, so what the hell, let homosexuals get legally-binding marriages, maybe they'll be able to restore some importance to it. Getting rid of the Mickey D's wedding chapels couldn't hurt either.
I'll tell you what, it was worth reading through three pages of this just to get to that quote. I'd sig it but I don't know if that would be against the rules, since it might not be very PC.Quote:
Originally Posted by BURN007
Roufuss, I was gonna sig it then I realized my sig is perfect as is. But yours could stand to get better.
DO IT.
Oh yeah, it's rockin now.Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
Um, it's mostly wanting what you can't have. It is the same for gay men with straight guys. Straight guys with lesbians. etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by DOVESKI
I just think gay guys sum up everything that women they think they want in men.
Doesn't hurt that they can't have them either, does it?Quote:
Originally Posted by burgundy
I don't think it makes much difference. Most women think they want a sensitive guy who exfoliates and listens to their needs, but then they all wind up with cavemen who smack them around and give them brainshattering orgasms.
brainshattering? is that why mothers are typically stupid people?Quote:
Originally Posted by burgundy