My post got partially deleted. I was gonna say that the position used to be honorable, but thanks to how the last few presidents were side-stepping our amendments by allowing corporate fundamentalists sink their hooks into congress, the position is already tainted. I'd much rather have a 3-4 man lead for multiple parties heading this country rather then one person that'll gradually fuck it up.Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
Business leaders have been allowed to donate large sums for campaign donations in which certain parties are asked to support in favor of their current business agenda. This has also allowed heavy lobbying to take place and influence in controlling the government. Bush's actions have already proven he's been siding with them for obvious reasons, just looking at how he treats consumer fair use, copyright law, or his support for the DMCA and the partriot act which is a foothold in searching through your property for evidence without justifiable cause.Quote:
02. How in the world does supporting private corporations imply communism?
and here's the reason why I refer to Bush as a communist
com'mu-nism n.
1. A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.
2. # Communism
1. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.
It all means capital control for corporate interests over the safety of american civilians.
corporate > government = communism
