23 year old teacher gives 14 year old student, and oral exam…

Unfortunately, she'll have to do the time cuz ya know, it's all about being "equal" nowadays.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flux=rad

Statutory rape is about coercion.

---

Rape is about coercion. Statutory rape is about having sex with someone under the age of 18.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Saint of Killers

Statutory rape is about having sex with someone under the age of 18.

---

What idoit made that law?

http://www.rotten.com/library/sex/pe...ay-letourneau/

note: vili was a talented artist indeed. the husband struck me as an ass, they fought alot. i was in that class. i sat next to that kid. She was my favorite teacher.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AstroBlue

Yeah, because humans have never reproduced at that age.... no... never... girls having babies directly after their menarche... it's unheard of.

---

Wow, way to completely miss the point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flux=rad

I call bullshit on this.


Some dude on IRC told me you had a Ph.D in the Psychology of Early-Teenage Boys Who Have Sex with Teachers. That's gotta come in handy for this thread

---

I have a B.A. in psychology.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flux=rad

So this lady is supposed to be thrown in jail for 15+ years because this kid "may" have a few problems after a few years.

---

Yes.

Quote:

---

Ridiculous. I'm sorry, but a boy getting laid when he's 14 years old doesn't qualify as a traumatic experience.

---

Got a degree in psychology do you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flux=rad

This isn't rape, and if you think it is, you watch too much Law & Order. In this situation, there was no threat of physical harm. The kid more than likely had the ability to rape the woman--not the other way around. If this lady is sent to jail (as that other lady was about 8 years ago), it is just stupid. That's blind adherence to moral rules with no regards to context. As though locking up a woman for raping a 14-year-old boy just as you would lock up a man for raping a 14-year-old girl is equal and just, as opposed to just simply stupid.

---

Women do not have immunity to the law just because they are women. There is obviously something wrong with the mind of someone who has sex with a child. No fourteen-year-old has the cognitive ability to make an informed and consenting decision to engage in something as significant in life as sex. Without proper counseling, the warped ideas this child now has about
sex and intamacy will only become further warped and dangerous.

Just because we were all hornballs who wanted to screw everything with a hole when we were younger doesn't mean we could've handled the emotional consequences from engaging in the act.

teh borked after reading that Vili article.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shidoshi

The point of all of this is, even if we have decided that it isn't proper, nature says that teenagers are fully prepared for sex, and nature doesn't dictate that they should only have sex with others of their age. We, however, have decided to go against nature in this way.

---

Wow.

Yeah, teenagers are physically ready to have sex. But we live in a society where you need to be more than just physically ready. You need to be able to fully understand what it is that you're undertaking - diseases, birth control, abortion, emotional attachments, etc. I think I can safely say that the majority of people under 18 are NOT ready to be having sex because they don't really understand everything that goes with it and aren't responsible enough to do it safely. They may think they understand, since when you're 18 you know everything, but they don't. That's not to say that most people over 18 are ready, but 18 is the age where the average person is graduating and thinking of college, so there is supposed to be more responsibility and understanding of oneself then.

Do you think the possibility of her getting pregnant even went through his mind? Does it go through the minds of most teens when they're screwing? I highly doubt it. How about sexual disease? Do you think he considered that he might become tired of her and she might stalk him? Possibly harm him? Just because none of this stuff happened or will happen in this case doesn't mean that she didn't take advantage of this young boy. If he turns out fine, that's great. But if he gets messed up and goes all Emo or something, that sucks.

And you're scaring me, too: decided to go against nature. That's like, the same type of thing a pedophile says to justify his/her actions.

Who the hell brought up slavery?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mike

And you're scaring me, too: decided to go against nature. That's like, the same type of thing a pedophile says to justify his/her actions.

---

You must have missed the thread about the ten year old who slit a classmates thoat where Shidoshi posted that she was hot and he liked his girls a little psycho. He's a pedo.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mike

Wow.

Yeah, teenagers are physically ready to have sex. But we live in a society where you need to be more than just physically ready. You need to be able to fully understand what it is that you're undertaking - diseases, birth control, abortion, emotional attachments, etc. I think I can safely say that the majority of people under 18 are NOT ready to be having sex because they don't really understand everything that goes with it and aren't responsible enough to do it safely. They may think they understand, since when you're 18 you know everything, but they don't. That's not to say that most people over 18 are ready, but 18 is the age where the average person is graduating and thinking of college, so there is supposed to be more responsibility and understanding of oneself then.

Do you think the possibility of her getting pregnant even went through his mind? Does it go through the minds of most teens when they're screwing? I highly doubt it. How about sexual disease? Do you think he considered that he might become tired of her and she might stalk him? Possibly harm him? Just because none of this stuff happened or will happen in this case doesn't mean that she didn't take advantage of this young boy. If he turns out fine, that's great. But if he gets messed up and goes all Emo or something, that sucks.

---

True, but is it a crime? Is one party who should know better doing other wise worth severial years of jail time? And if the rest of what you say is so wrong it sounds like we should be jailing anyone under 30 for having sex. If him not knowing better, or not being mature is what makes this wrong, why are we not jailing the few billion american kids that sneak off the bang during PE in highschool? If it really causes the mental problems you guys speak of then something should be done.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mike

Who the hell brought up slavery?

---

Tyler was trying to be cute. Because you know, if people believe or do one bad thing during a time period, everything else is bad and wrong too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master of 7s

Got a degree in psychology do you?

---

Being rude much?

If haveing sex when you are 14 tramitizes kids then that must be what is wrong with this country. Everyone has lost their minds becuase they were tramatized as teenagers because they got lucky with Sandy Monroe on the Bus on their way to the next football game.

For someone who has a B.A. in psychology you are failing to admit that not all people are the same, and that something that screws one kid up will slide right by another kid.

At thirteen, they know the consequences but rather they let their hormones take over. I mean, if a thirteen year old killed someone you know there muct have been something wrong WAY before that, I mean at roughly 10 or below. Human behaviour isn't that simple.

Though I do get that the kids may repect women less, but I don't think it would be of the kind that results in rape.