Originally Posted by diffusionx
LOL. Ive talked about this before, but the whole idea of "the great crash" is a myth. I bet if I asked you what caused the crash, you'd say that it was "loads and loads of crappy games for the 2600/Intellivision/Colecovision that were coming out. Then Nintendo saved the industry". That was a load of horse manure that Nintendo used to justify the seal of approval/licensing process for the NES. People bought it hook line and sinker and now sadly it is fact. I forget what book it's in... but umm it might be Game Over, or it might be The First Quarter. You should The First Quarter, at least.
I'll also tell you while this "great crash" was going on, gaming on the PC/Mac/Atari/Amiga/C64 was still doing great. In fact, some of the best games ever, like Ultima III, came out during this so-called "crash". And the PC platform has been doing just fine for the past 20 years or so without a licensing process.
So yes, yes, the console gaming industry had a slump, a downturn, in the early 1980s, but by no means did the gaming industry as a whole bottom out, and one can argue that Nintendo didn't do the game industry any favors, really, considering they used this "savior of gaming" licensing process to bully retailers and developers... and by 1988 they were just a monstrous monopoly.
Now, Im not trying to say that Japanese game developers are irrelevant to gaming - thatd be nonsense. They've been hugely influential, especially from 85-95, and changed the face of gaming a number of times. However, to call them "founding fathers" would be ridiculous - like calling Abraham Lincoln a founding father. They just aren't founding fathers. It's not the right term. It doesn't work.
So STFU and come back when you know what you're talking about.