Kerry gets pwned

that's wonderful, but please keep it out of sound off

- cka

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Yoshi

No, every state should outlaw it though.

---

Dictating the laws every state should adopt? That sounds like big government to me, you damn dirty liberal!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dave is ok

I wish John McCain was running so we could see ads like "...While John McCain was serving time in a POW camp for five years, he made alot of friends. Alot of communist friends. We have eyewitness accounts that he played checkers with his captors, america's enemies. "

---

Hahahah...so fuckin true.

This is some lowbrow sh!t, fuck healthcare, the economy, and the daily bombings in Iraq - lets talk about what a pussy John Kerry was in Vietnam.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by g0zen

Dictating the laws every state should adopt? That sounds like big government to me, you damn dirty liberal!

---

I've changed my stance a bit. I want California to make it legal, but that's it. The other 49 states won't recognize it. With any luck, that will shift the population to that already hopeless state.

You mean, like a big, gay concentration camp? Nice.

Wow, never thought Yoshi was a bigotted piece of shit until now. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Yoshi

The other 49 states won't recognize it.

---

Unconstitutional.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Yoshi

I've changed my stance a bit. I want California to make it legal, but that's it. The other 49 states won't recognize it. With any luck, that will shift the population to that already hopeless state.

---

Wow. I know that on the internet it's cool to be rebellious, full of angst and anti-establishment and all, but if you truly feel this way, then.....wow.


You know, the funny thing about the whole Gay Marriage subject is that I have yet to hear a legitimate reason to stop it, outside of using religion (which the government is supposed to leave alone). How is there more freedom in preventing a whole group of people from getting married? How is this more tolerant? How is this different than witholding voting rights to minorities or women? Why do you care how another person conducts their life, unless it has a very direct effect on your life? Wouldn't writing a constitutional ban be, in essence, writing discrimination into the constitution?

Can someone answer these answers without sounding like a bigot or religious zealot?

I say let them have the chance to get married if they choose to. Don't ban it, but don't force the churches into doing it. If the couple can find a church to marry them, more power to them. Otherwise, civil unions aren't a bad compromise.

Churches shouldn't be forced to marry gay couples, but this is a legal issue, not a religious one. Some churches already do gay marriages, legal or not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sethsez

Churches shouldn't be forced to marry gay couples, but this is a legal issue, not a religious one. Some churches already do gay marriages, legal or not.

---

It should be left up to the churches, not the states or the nation.