Printable View
Don't you mean arguing with anyone on this board who has set political opinions? Why is it that the Conservatives on this board are looked at like manipulated pawns when the other members of the board argue their points in the exact same manner?Quote:
Originally Posted by Opaque
you know what's sad?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gohron
I said to stop it arguing with them, but even I can't stop. :cry:
Yea, seriously. People like g0zen are the enlightened ones when they spout off MoveOn dogma, but I of course have to be a slave to some giant floating Republican brain under the Denver Airport. Never mind that reading about American history and politics is a hobby of mine, I spend at least an hour a day reading all the news websites, I read mags like Time and Newsweek, when Im in school I read newspapers daily (and its mostly the liberal LA Times), I watch talking head shows all the time, Ive listened to Airhead America far more than is healthy, and the university I attend is a stronghold of Liberal Thinking.Quote:
Conservatives on this board are looked at like manipulated pawns when the other members of the board argue their points in the exact same manner?
But nope, no none of my opinions are my own or anything.
Thats true. But dont the ends justify the means? If they do, then its not worth arguing over the pecularities of the WMD thing. The fact is, Hussein has had WMDs in some capcity, and he has had a WMD weapons program in place. Also, the fact is, he has supported terrorists and he would've continued to do so.Quote:
Hiding behind WMDs was pointless.
Kerry likes to say that Bush tricked him and shit, even though Kerry had access to the same exact info that Bush did, being a senator and all.
I forget the exact name of the polling company, IMT/IMDB or something.Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
:lol: :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Opaque
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0402577/Quote:
Originally Posted by StriderKyo
I don't think a war is justified if you have to lie to the American public to sell it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
In my opinion, Bush should have focussed all his attention on Afghanistan and the capture (or killing) of Osama bin Laden before doing anything else.
Anyone know when that's supposed to come out?Quote:
Originally Posted by dave is ok
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
And thats democracy how?
Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
Then stop being partisan, and understand that the only things that matter are facts and track record, not which party the candidate came from.
If Dan Quayle was president right now, I'd have a hard time believing you could go against him.
I don't care what your opinions are, I just don't see an intelligent man, thinking that Bush isn't going to fuck this world up.Quote:
Never mind that reading about American history and politics is a hobby of mine, I spend at least an hour a day reading all the news websites, I read mags like Time and Newsweek, when Im in school I read newspapers daily (and its mostly the liberal LA Times), I watch talking head shows all the time, Ive listened to Airhead America far more than is healthy, and the university I attend is a stronghold of Liberal Thinking.
Quote:
But nope, no none of my opinions are my own or anything.
I've seen you maybe once, no twice, disagree with the republicans, but then you immediately defended them, so I think you like to believe your opinions on these matters are your own, but the second anyone attacks the party you like to associate with, you can't take it, even if the claims are legit.
No they don't. Thats the point.Quote:
Thats true. But dont the ends justify the means? If they do, then its not worth arguing over the pecularities of the WMD thing. The fact is, Hussein has had WMDs in some capcity, and he has had a WMD weapons program in place. Also, the fact is, he has supported terrorists and he would've continued to do so.
We didn't go after Hitler on false presumptions, we did go after Saddam under them. Thats it really. Your president lied to get this country into a ground war in Iraq....
Considering we almost impeached Clinton over a blowjob (and don't argue he lied in court, cause he lied in court over a blowjob, which ultimately means nothing to anyone but the religious right, who've never had one), which one seems worse?
Quote:
Kerry likes to say that Bush tricked him and shit, even though Kerry had access to the same exact info that Bush did, being a senator and all.
Dude. Kerry never should have been talking about his war record that much I can agree with.
But the fact is, Kerry is retarded for not understanding that these accusations are coming from somebody who didn't even go to the Vietnam War, and probably begged daddy to get him into the guard cause he was too chicken shit to go.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opaque
Thats why I ignore you.
No offense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bacon McShig
Yes it is.
Hitler never attacked the US. Japan did.Quote:
We didn't go after Hitler on false presumptions, we did go after Saddam under them. Thats it really. Your president lied to get this country into a ground war in Iraq....
PREEMPTIVE, ILLEGAL ATTACK! END THE OCCUPATION OF GERMANY NOW!
You dont even know where I stand on so many issues yet you say trash like this. Fact is, the only thing political people talk about on TNL is the war in Iraq, then Almaci comes in and ruins it. So youre getting a one-sided view of me from one issue where yes, I do side with conservatives.Quote:
I've seen you maybe once, no twice, disagree with the republicans, but then you immediately defended them, so I think you like to believe your opinions on these matters are your own, but the second anyone attacks the party you like to associate with, you can't take it, even if the claims are legit.