Killzone

i remember in the early days of development all they talked about was how smart the AI was going to be and how youll feel like youre in the middle of a war. doesnt seem like they cashed the chips on either of those :(

This game was way overhyped. Itcameout of nowherethough. Its at E3 and gets somemedia and then Sony calls it a Halo-Killer. Even though the score people will still buy it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by remnant

This game was way overhyped. Itcameout of nowherethough.

---

Nice, you just completely contradicted yourself.

I meant it came out of nowhere at E3 and was hyped all year long

IGN gave it 7.5 ....meh' i'll pass(that includes Halo 2)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dolemite

I ran into none of these problems. I shot someone a few times, they'd die. If I scored a headshot they'd die instantly. If I got shot once or twice I'd lose health but not die. No problems picking up or cycling though weapons, either.

Maybe that's why they call 'em Betas, huh?

---

yes, i am talking about multiplayer, but the point i was trying to make is, they may have made the game beautiful looking, ect. ect., but to me it didnt show much of the companies quality if the basic game (shooting, killing, picking up guns, ect.) didnt work. Yes thats why they are called betas, to make sure everythings working properly, not announcing the obvious fault they didnt fix making the game unberable to really beta test.