Printable View
I wouldn't be against a western studio taking a crack at a Castlevania game so long as they kept KCET's art studios. Or at least hire a decent one to fill the void. Or perhaps a joint US/Japanese developed Castlevania. I generally don't like the result when a Japanese franchise gets put entirely in the hands of a western developer, even though there are a few notable exceptions.
Lament of Innocence was one of the least enjoyable "Castlevania" games I've played.
He's amusing, yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joust Williams
The string cheese I just ate is funnier. It has more material.
no he's not. so thats 2 against one. we win.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew
You two are balls of comedy yourselves.
Oh and this isn't a democracy.
Posts as rational as this one are starting to seem really out of place here.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeoZeedeater
I'm having a hard time seeing why this is a discussion that needs to be had. I can't even think of more than a couple people on here that seem to think old games are so much better than new ones, and certainly not to the stupid extent that Diffx pretends new games are the other way around.
we never said we were.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew
oh wait.....i got democracy mixed up with the constant andrew/diff x anal engagement party we all put up with. my bad.
keep it civil
You don't get invited to many parties, do you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonmaster Dyne
Beat-em-ups can encompass many different parts of gameplay, but the definition I go on for them is based on length. If it's long enough to where I can see myself beating it in one sitting at an arcade, then it's a traditional-style beat-em-up. Then you have the hack-n-slash style, like Golden Axe. NG could, arguably, be a descendent of this style of play, but the noted length I've seen for it keeps it out of the traditional beat-em-up genre name, as do the puzzle elements. Genres blending together is certainly more prominent now than before, which has the potential to be really awesome.