Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
Eh no. Thats a sweeping generalization. Though to be fair, so is this crap about Bush fitting hte bill of anti-christ, name one politician in the last 20 years who didn't do all those things, (except the whole attacking a whole country first thing, that was all Bush.)
And yet a fucking atheist liberal (me) just went and re-edited the entire Anti-Christ entry in Wikipedia, removed all the Anti-Bush spam and reconstituted all of the relevant bible verses that were removed.Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
So either I am "sample error" or you're a generalising horse's arse.
Olberman spoke last night about a small town of about 650 voters clocking in 300 votes for Kerry and... 4,500 for Bush. I've heard other figures in other areas, but this is the only one standing out right now.
One thing's for sure, all of the errors have been been in favor of Bush. You can say "Oh, mistakes happen. That's way too far fetched" all you want, but if your shit kept on coming up missing and kept on ending up in my house, I doubt you'd hesitate to beat my face in.
Where's the independent council on this one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysteriousRacerC
I've heard this one, though I ain't bringing it up till its relevant, which may be never.
Best I can say is cross your fingers and hope that the Ohio electoral adminsitrator halts to investigate, which I believe is the only action you could take at this point.
"which was and is the relevant election issue in a time of war"
How? The same states that voted for Bush last time voted for him again. A few switched to him (NH went to Kerrry). Gore is better than Kerry, so nnaturally some would switch. I don't see how this automatically implies the election was based on morality.
Almost all Dems voted for Kerry...almost all Reps voted for Bush. So did Kerry garner all those votes just because he is a Democrat? That's just as bad. Just because *you* think he'd be better for the war doesn't mean a) he is or b) other people are putting Iraq ahead of domestic policy.
This is what you said i nanother thread:
"Yoshi. Don't insult my state like that again please unless you actually have a reason to say something that stupid."
Now it's time for you to do the same here, which means you can't just say things that may or may not be true. He's got some evidence that supports a claim (even if it isn't true) of what he said, so if he is wrong, then you've got to be too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysteriousRacerC
If this were true, it would be front page news of the NY Times .. and scrolled every 10 minutes on CNN.
Stop the bullshit.
Let me contrast with you for a second. I believe in my opinion, so I state it. Yoshi has a tendency, (and if such a claim came from anyone else on this board I would not have written that line with such venom) to state his opinion as general sweeping fact. I do not claim to know John Kerry would be better at dealing with the war on terror than George Bush, but I believe two things.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joust Williams
1) A government without checks being run an administration that does not tolerate being questioned, is dangerous.
and,
2) Kerry's administration, by default, would not have been capable of the utter disregard, and lack of humility that this one has had in a time of war.
To sum it up. Opinoin. I have sat on mine for awhile, and I am vocalizing it to those who tell me that their's is right and fact when I do not believe what they are saying is and must be, the only way.
Okay, Political Threads.
Matte.
No more. You win. I'm tapping the fuck out. Enjoy.
Your better than that Matt, why the tap out?
Resistance is futile.