Quote:
Originally Posted by omfgninjas
I was corrected a long while ago, and already call myself an ass thank you very much :link:
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by omfgninjas
I was corrected a long while ago, and already call myself an ass thank you very much :link:
EA is really starting to piss me off.
Goddamn. I was looking forward so much to a new ESPN game. Last years was PERFECT.
Thanks you EA douchebags.
I guess I'll repeat it since some of you seem to have missed it. The NFL owns the AFL. Part of the deal for EA's exclusive NFL rights was to make an exclusive AFL game. Not because the AFL game will be lucrative. But because the NFL wants there to be an AFL game.Quote:
Originally Posted by youandwhosearmy
EA securing exclusive rights to AFL isn't another douchebag move like the NFL license was. It is the same move--just another effect of it.
Whoops! :bang:Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
Former Cowboys special teams coach Alvazono. They never showed the special teams coach on the sidelines this year. I knew something was missing, but couldn't put a finger on it. I know one thing; the Cowboys special teams sucked this year.
I actually do recall seeing him on the Raiders sidelines. I was like :wtf:
Maybe.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonmaster Dyne
This just in, someone who posts as much crap as you really shouldn't complain.Quote:
Originally Posted by omfgninjas
PBMax, stop being so boring and lame.
I guess your repetition didn't do much, but for some reason, I feel like you're wrong. I saw an interview on CNN with Chris Morris the writer for CNN Money regarding the deal, and supposivly the AFL approached EA before the NFL deal was even in talks. For this reason alone I feel like you're way off target.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkRyan
Also, does the NFL own the AFL? I tryed searching around to find out about that, but it was to no avail. Because if this interview was any sort of accurate, then your theory is obviously not the case. I'd also love to know why the AFL liscence wasn't announced when the NFL liscence was if they were both aquired in this deal...
edit: I noticed something else also, if these liscences were aquired together, why is the NFL and NFLPA deal for 5 years, while the AFL is only for 4 years?
edit again: After furthur investigation your crazy theory that these deals were done together and the NFL owns the AFL are most likely wrong. Unless numerous reliable news sources are wrong, the deals were completely seperate, and had absolutly no relation to eachother.
LinkafiedQuote:
Originally Posted by GameIndustry.biz
Notice it also says RIVALS in relation to the AFL and NFL eluding to the NFL not owning the AFL (which if true, I find it kinda weird that I had never heard of that before), and also referring to how these SEPERATE signing of liscencing deals were of completely different magnitudes (the NFL's deal naturally being larger).
DiffX please stop being a worthless troll.Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
PBMax, stop before you fall any further behind.Quote:
Originally Posted by PBMax
I'm pretty sure that no XFL games came on at the same time as NFL games. Can anyone confirm this?