Does anyone else think that Microsoft has a really good shot at becoming number 1?
The DC was the fastest selling console ever and had a ton of hype. Sega even managed tog et a 3 million userbase head start on Sony but the developers pretty much decided stop supporting the system. Sega ran out of money and the rest is history. If Sega was as strong as Nintendo, I believed that they would have been a strong number 2 if they continued supporting ithe DC till now. With games like VF4, Sega Sports series, and probably SC2 etc. exclusive to the DC. I figured that both Microsoft and Nintendo was banking on the DC holding off the PS2 long enough for their systems to be competitive, but the DC died and Sony got too big of a headstart.
Now with the Xenon, I see all major third parties besides square supporting it from the get go. Including EA, one of the things that slowed the DC down. So how can the third parties refuse to mainly support the Xenon if microsoft can get like a 3 million plus userbase headstart right away AND gurantee that the system will last a solid 4 years. third parties would be stupid not to start form the Xenon and port up to the newer systems. If the Xenon has like a 6 months headstart, that's a solid half year of great exclusives, while the other systems would only have first party exclusives. I think the brute force tactic of spending/losing money till you are profitable is goign to work this time due to a headstart rather than playing catch up. Running out of money killed the DC but that isnt a problem for Microsoft. I predict that Microsoft will get 1st or 2nd guranteed. So I guess the revolution is in trouble. :D