IBTN, but in the (limited) amount of classes I have taken in fields like English, Comparative Writing, Art History, etc., I see interpretation being a big part of it, and comparisons, and question-asking, and so forth. But no question-answering. So basically students will write a paper where they ask questions, come up with answers, turn it in, and get a grade. But every answer is as good as the last. So its a lot of means without any end. Im not seeing a lot of useful work coming from English departments at universities. And especially not from Philosophy departments. If Im wrong by all means point me to some examples of useful work but really I would think the Sociology, Anthropology, Political Science, or Psychology departments are doing a lot more (even though the first 2 are mired under a lot of ridiculous pretentious go-nowhere bullshit - Sociology crosses with Philosophy a lot, and thats where it seems a lot of Sociology professors come from).Quote:
I'm not sidestepping anything. You were both crapping on the study of English because you see it at useless, I'm here to tell you isn't useless. That said, philosophy isn't useless either, but your opportunities for employment are limited in both case.
Im not saying this is exclusive to the -ologies side of things. I often have a tough time seeing the big picture in my math classes - a "so what" comes to mind when I read about simple groups or whatever. But its not the same. And Im fairly open-minded, seeing as I have a healthy dose of interest in both sides of the fence (just for reference I scored higher on the English portion of my SAT than my math, and the honors classes I took in high school were in history).
