What my kitty does is she walks over to my head and then I pet her, and then she turns around 360 and stops again and keeps doing it. Then she goes to sleep by my head for a while, and then I fall asleep and she leaves. She's nice cute kitty 8 )
What my kitty does is she walks over to my head and then I pet her, and then she turns around 360 and stops again and keeps doing it. Then she goes to sleep by my head for a while, and then I fall asleep and she leaves. She's nice cute kitty 8 )
http://img64.echo.cx/img64/2812/trojanhorse3ho.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by ElCapitan
In a house, comprised of wood and other assorted materials made from trees.Quote:
Originally Posted by StriderKyo
See above.Quote:
But keep trying, you'll get me next time.
You are missing the point entirely. National Forests are more than just tourist attractions. Anyone who likes breathing clean air and not being the only species on this continent appeciates our forests.Quote:
Originally Posted by piku
I'll answer your questions, even if they are irrelevent. Can I name one? I'll do you one better and name a forest that shares my last name: Estes National Park in Colorado. And I've been to the Redwood National Forest, among others.
Bush's agenda is so obvious. The destruction of these forests create more roads, for more cars, which consumes more oil. When was the last time this tool did something that had a purpose other than making the upper class more money?
He lives in a brick house with stucco interior and carpeting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew
I am simply curious. I've been noticing an odd trend the last few years (of people I’ve come into contact with) of environmentalists not only not going outside into nature ever, but actually hating being in the woods, and the kind of people who support Bush (hunters for example) are the ones who use the outdoors more in a week than most people do in a year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
I wasn’t really calling him out or anything I was just wondering.
Brick houses use wood for framing.Quote:
Originally Posted by g0zen
Its a renewable resource in case any of you forgot. And they arn't cutting down fucking yellowstone.
I sugest you drive in the part of your state thats not a city, its a huge fucking forest/plain. I read somewhere that if you took all of the buildings, and concrete, tar, roads everything like that on put it all together it equals the size of Ohio. The rest of the country is the wilderness.
For the record, I live in a condo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew
Reading is hard. I know, it's not really fair. I mean, with cartoons the people just say what they want you to know, and if that's too hard the pictures move so you can understand.Quote:
See above.
But with reading you have all these letters and words, and as soon as you've put one sentence together there's another right after it! Sometimes you even have to make entire paragraphs - phew! What alot of work! Really, who can keep track of all that at once?
But that's okay, I'm here for you. I'll review this situation so you can get it. Here's how it went:
Kinopio: This land was protected. There's alot of it, 58.5 million acres.
Diffusion: That's okay, I'm sure the logging companies will take better care of it than the people who weren't going to cut any of it down.
Strider: That doesn't make sense.
Andrew: LOL, YOU HAVE WOOD. I OHNED YOO.
There, do you see the problem? No? That's okay. No, please, stop crying. Here, have a cookie. Do you need to take a nap first? No? Good. Buck up, you'll get this reading comprehension thing licked yet.
You see, I'm not anti-wood. Our ancestors lived in a world full of it. Even the mighty druids, the world's first tree huggers, would cut trees down to make things they needed.
But sometimes, in the grownup world, things can be complicated. Like, not black & white - wait, stop crying - here, here's your Futurama doll for you to hug while - no! Now Andrew, you take that filthy thing out of your mouth right now! Good boy.
Anyway, like I was saying, not agreeing that protected forests - and a heck of alot them, too - are better off in the hands of logging companies than a publicly accountable government conservation agency is not the same as being against wood or something.
Wait - you're saying that wood has to come from somewhere? Yes, well, that's why they didn't protect all of it, just some. You see...
Aw, now you're crying again. Here, let me explain it again with smaller words...hey - hey, what are you doing with that doll? Get your hand out of your pants! Ugh...screw this. I'm outta here.
That is a pseudo-myth. The problem with this kind of thinking is that you do not consider things such as lack of old growth, enviromental pollution damages and human interference (such as running machines that cut down trees). All those things are important in keeping species healthy, which would be the biggest harm from this massive amount of land being harvested. If they were protected then they would be able to develope into adult forests (if they are not allready).Quote:
Originally Posted by Clash!