I've boughten a few. All of them are kind of fun to play. Smashing Drive? Maybe. Smash TV? It's Smash SOMETHING. Anyway it's fun. Just shoot shit as long as possible.
Printable View
I've boughten a few. All of them are kind of fun to play. Smashing Drive? Maybe. Smash TV? It's Smash SOMETHING. Anyway it's fun. Just shoot shit as long as possible.
... hasn't come out yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
That's what i was saying.Quote:
Geometry Wars
Most of the xbla releases are just old games, aren't they? I like that. I think it's great. I just don't see why xbla is good and virtual console is bad. They do the same thing for similar prices. And shut up if you think the xbla pricing is better than the virtual console pricing. That's just stupid.
Sorry, Geometry Wars: Retro EvolvedQuote:
Originally Posted by Nash
I consider the version in PGR2 the first game, though I guess I can understand why someone wouldn't.
XBLA has leaderboards and makes those old games not look like ass on an HDTV. VC is just Nesticle and some ROMS. And who is going to make original content for it? Nintendo is an assembly assholes, MS (like it or not) isn't. And stupid kids don't buy downloadable content.
I think the main thing people like about XBLA is the achievements, redone graphics, and high score tables. Right now it appears VC will just be basic ROMs. If VC has the same shit XBLA does then good, but right now thats why XBLA is good and VC is bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Finch
I'm all set.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shin Johnpv
No one said the VC is bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Finch
VC hasn't proved itself yet. No game has been announced with new content, no game has achievements, ( will never understand why people give a fuck about those but to each his own) and no new stuff has been shown. Just hinted at.
See, now that's something i didn't know. Not that i own an hdtv, but some day i'll probably be pissed about it, and the leaderboards thing should be ripped off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joust Williams
This indicates there may be graphical enhancements, but i'd rather it just be made to look good on an hdtv. Extra levels would be nice too. ): Mario 3 was ruined for me on gba.
This says there will be new content available at launch, though the lack of source or any info doesn't really help.
And SNES9X, Generator, and whatever the other systems are. For 1-player content, there should be a great library. There might not be, but there really should be. And yeah, emulate on Sboss or computron, but again, that horrible "want legal copy" thing gets in the way.Quote:
VC is just Nesticle and some ROMS.
Hopefully someone. Nintendo 2006 is a much friendlier company than Nintendo 1986, or even Nintendo 2000. (:\ I don't know what you mean by assembly assholes) If i'm to believe what i've read, the company wants small developers to make game for the system. (here)Quote:
And who is going to make original content for it? Nintendo is an assembly assholes, MS (like it or not) isn't.
:P You're right, only stupid adults. That's what we want.Quote:
And stupid kids don't buy downloadable content.
I'm just wanting it to be good, kind of like Wii Sports. ): Golf. Tennis. Do those right and i'm set.
The thing that gets me about VC is that due to it being vanilla emulation, the library should be pretty damn massive. But from the sounds of it, they're planning on releasing something like 10 titles a month or whatever.Quote:
And SNES9X, Generator, and whatever the other systems are. For 1-player content, there should be a great library. There might not be, but there really should be. And yeah, emulate on Sboss or computron, but again, that horrible "want legal copy" thing gets in the way.
And yeah, with the XBLA enhancements and all that, it just looks much better in my eyes.