My best friends cousins brother fought Ermac in MK1.
Printable View
My best friends cousins brother fought Ermac in MK1.
I've only seen him once, don't remember his specials.
Reptile has a spear like Scorpion. Except its a snake.
Me either, but here is a site about Ermac.Quote:
Originally Posted by voltz
How in the fuck did you find that?Quote:
Originally Posted by g0zen
Because I'm selling my skillz like Happy Meals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Giga Power
They first flew over for the A3 nationals in I believe 98. 10 years ago, which is the old school SF2 days, it is somewhat believed that we actually had the best players, but there was no intercontinental challenges. In fact, post A3, we have gotten alot worse in comparison to japan, and just in the past year or two have been playing catch up to thier level of play. We have maybe, 5 players who sorta stand up, but certainly do not beat, thier tournament level players. For CVS2 even less. Why I said Q, is not because he sucks so much (and yes, he still sucks, he does decent against chun, but bad against ken), but its because japan has a player of Q up to the level of top tier characters. Clearly, they have enough capable players to playtest a more diverse cast of characters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sl1p
As for noob:
Evolution (last year): 9th (150+ players, one of the only players to beat RF)
NEC: 2nd (50+ players)
ECC: 3rd (60+ players)
Current Evolution: http://www.shoryuken.com/forums/showthread.php?t=94625
Team leader for North East Coast. Quick Question, have you played a top japanese player in SFIII?
Edit: Actually we did get horribly raped by a Q player, i believe in like 2002, i might be off by a year. I think he beat everyone one of our top players, pretty sure its on one of the dvd's, might be wrong though.
I think you're not seeing the whole picture. Whatever. Watch a rush-down Necro rape you at Evo.Quote:
its because japan has a player of Q up to the level of top tier characters.
So if you're so experienced, why do you come off as not knowing anything? You've seen your fair share of insanity so maybe you should learn from it.
Have I ever played a top Japanese player in SFIII? Not seriously, no. And by "not seriously" I mean not in a competitive setting. I'm obviously not going to doubt top tier Japanese play at 3S. What I'm saying is that the margin in which they dominate us is a Hell of a lot smaller these days than ever before.
Oh, and I believe the Q bit if it was from 2002. Hardly anyone in America was even playing at that time. Hell, that was still in the days when everyone around here thought Chun-Li automatically made the game not worth playing.
I'm really not trying to completely diss you here, it's just that you're either not communicating correctly or you're just oddly close minded.
What I am trying to say, is that we are simply not the best place to loke test a fighting game, unless this evolution proves differently. We don't have arcade senario they still have, or the diversity. Isn't that what this argument is about? Actually, the Q bit was a typo, i meant to say twelve. I corrected on the twelve, because someone asked, not because i thought it meant anything for the argument. We have some good players, we are on the up, not down, but for a series like SF, I would still rather let japan take a serious look at it before america. If capcom is going to continue to not take fighting games seriously, then I really don't know.
wow, that's the most retarded thing i've read all week.Quote:
Originally Posted by Destin
as far as "testing" goes, let the japs get a loke test, then let the usa get loke tests as well. if you stick enough of us crazy bastards in a room together we're bound to break it in a matter of hours(i can work on the combo engine with some homies from cali while the tourney players can beat on each other).