I did.Quote:
Originally Posted by MechDeus
And Bond being gay is lame. BUT I see nothing wrong with Bond being R. I think it would be refreshing to see a guy become shark chum with a rocket propelled grenade to the face.
Printable View
I did.Quote:
Originally Posted by MechDeus
And Bond being gay is lame. BUT I see nothing wrong with Bond being R. I think it would be refreshing to see a guy become shark chum with a rocket propelled grenade to the face.
^lol. Anyway, I though it was excellent.
This is the best movie I've seen all year. And I'm not a James Bond fan whatsoever. It was amazing.
However, I went out and got the book because I liked the movie so much, and the book is very, very, very homoerotic. I am pleased with this.
This movie sucked. It went on and on, and a lot of the shit that happened was pointless. And what was with the blatent homoerotic subtex in this movie? Luckly I didn't pay to see this, I should've walked into Happy Feet or something instead.
I know who I dont have to pay attention to anymore.
I enjoyed it up til the end, where it sorta dragged.
A gay Bond ruins the franchise, you can not be 007 and swallow loads, nobody will buy it.
Great movie, finally Bond mans up and does some killin' when killin' needs to be done.
That's what I'm saying. Small undertone does not equal gay.
Anal sex with another man would be a sure fire way to tell for sure.
That's true. That wasn't in the movie I saw.