Ya? Do you want a Nazi running both the United States AND the Vatican?
Printable View
Ya? Do you want a Nazi running both the United States AND the Vatican?
Agreed. Fuckin' bi-partisanism.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr-K
Explanation on that last one, pls.Quote:
Originally Posted by Error
I want to see more bipartianship but its not just the citizens that are having these arguments. The Bush Administration is one of, if not the most, uncooperative administrations in history. They don't give a shit what Democrats want, hell, they dont give a shit what Congress wants. And lets be real, Republicans have been in power since 1994 and in absolute power since 2001, if you don't like the direction the country has gone there's only one party to blame (well, you can blame the Dems insofar as they never acted like a proper opposition party).Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr-K
Hell. yes. for bipartisanship. I'm sick of biases and overopinionated party leaders who can't get along with anyone else. What this country needs is some common sense. How are we called the UNITED States if we can't agree on shit?Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
Ratzinger was a Nazi before, while searching for Jews to ship off, he looked under a rock and found Jesus.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaoofNee
Way to miss the point. The current troubles are the fault of one party if not one presidency. After 9/11 the entire country was lockstep in rhythm, but it faded quickly when Bush began ruling by decree instead of conscent. Also, if we can't agree on anything it's called a 'democracy'.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarsVolta
John Edwards would be sweet. He could talk to the dead ex-presidents and get great advice on what to do, and maybe find out where Osama is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Error
He doesn't TALK to them, n00b. He gets 'images' and 'symbols'.
I'm reading an 'h-name' like Harry, Herbert, Harriet..Is that connecting anything with you 'doshi? What about one of your friends? Their friends? I'll get it eventually.
I realize that in full, and maybe I worded that wrong. But if the country is to be run right, the important stuff has to be agreed upon and not fought over for long periods of time. The party thing gets in the way sometimes, especially recently with the Republicans having the majority in everything. We need balance if not a shift. I will agree that yes recently the Bush administration has fucked things up since 9/11 way more than they should have been.Quote:
Originally Posted by g0zen
They have my vote.Quote:
Originally Posted by YellerDog
http://aces.tabulas.com/tarebear/thu...-norris-bn.jpg
I can show you a picture of Hillary hugging Bush if you'd like, does that prove that Hillary sucks Bush's cock?Quote:
Originally Posted by g0zen
I agree that the Bush smear on McCain was a disgrace (it was the reason I didn't vote for Bush in 2000). That McCain "played ball" with Bush doesn't mean anything, Bush is the president. As an elected official you can't just refuse to deal with the President because of a personal grudge. I never said McCain doesn't play politics, I said he's not a career politician and he's honest. He could easily get the Republican nod and he's the Republican that the most non-Republicans would vote for.
Powell embarassed himself with the WMD thing because he loves to hear himself speak. He doesn't want to be the President anyway.
He faught the stranglehold that the democratic party has over teachers and nurses unions, and that these unions can pour money into the party's coffers without the consent of it's members. It's a little different from "fighting against teachers and nurses".Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx