That's the problem. I get it now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diff-chan
Printable View
That's the problem. I get it now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diff-chan
This is all pre medicare part D:Quote:
I'm still on the fence, if I could be convinced that the US government wouldn't royally fuck it up and reassured that chronic abuse by people could be prevented then my opinion could be swayed.
Medicare is run more efficiently and with less overhead than private insurers now. They dont have to spend the money to process people in and out of the plan (which takes a large chunk out of private company's hands). They have tons of people in their plan which gives them buying power (keeps costs down) and the ability to positively influence hospitals in matters like IT. The VA has a completely IT-driven system so things like drug conflicts pop up instantly, so money isnt wasted on prescribing a person a drug, and then havign to pay for their hospital visits later on.
It really is a bad stereotype, perpetuated by Republicans mainly, that government can't do anything right. Medicare is an efficient and well-run program and has been for decades. The VA, once it got a good director (not a crony) under Clinton, because a hospital system to be envied. As it is, 44% of medical bills are paid by the government.
Of course, Republicans took a huge shit on the system with Medicare Part D - but when you actively work to harm a system, and then claim the system doesn't work right, isn't that a bit disingenuous?
All I got from your post is that CEOs invest their time into making sure the company is running the way it should be. that's wht they're there to do.
I don't see how that is intellectual property, though. If they are working for a company anything they do stays with that company. Don't they have contracts prohibiting them from taking any information with them to another company, anyway?
You should have just said "no."
this sums up my feelings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr-K
I like to read my own text.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
That's good, because nobody else does, in this topic at least.Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor Ramon
and on that note, back to Capcom Bowling for me.
I am not comfortable with this, I'm in the same boat as IronPlant.Quote:
Originally Posted by buttcheeks
you are wrongQuote:
Originally Posted by Diff-chan
http://www.worldandi.com/public/1999/March/problems.cfm
http://www.hschange.org/CONTENT/466/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract
http://www.kaisernetwork.org/Daily_r...fm?DR_ID=34849
http://www.nihp.org/Issue%20Briefs/P...t%201%20PB.htm
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medi...p?newsid=36326
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...-benefit_x.htm
http://www.healthcareproblems.org/Bi...IBMedicare.htm
http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-med18.html
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medi...p?newsid=39878
http://www.scienceblog.com/community...1/pub1024.html
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...w110450D77.DTL
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06015/638282-321.stm
Medicare is far from an efficient and well-run program. It pays doctors less for care. Their computers have a built in bug in them that kick out claims to keep from paying doctors. They do not pay clinics for the time that it takes to fill out all their bureaucratic bullshit. They dick their users on what they will and will not cover. To file medicare now, you need a 2 or 3 thousand dollar program that cost an absurd licencing fee to keep up to date. Its gotten so bad that many doctors refuse to take new medicare users because it isn't worth their time.
Who the hell have you talked to about this? Where are you getting your information? It defiantly wasn't anyone that is paid with it or uses it to pay for their care.
About the same amount of time it's gonna take her to sue you for sexual harassment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash