So, if Bush were to sell Stinger Missiles to al-Queda elements you'd have no problem with that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff_Pocoroba
Hmm..
Printable View
So, if Bush were to sell Stinger Missiles to al-Queda elements you'd have no problem with that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff_Pocoroba
Hmm..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omni
Oh cool another me to assnut.
yes I can.
The only way we as a nation are every going to have equal rights is to have everyone pay a flat tax. It should be somewhat lower than the middle class pays right now. This can be accomplished by reducing government spending on the top level and making a more conserted effort to increase jobs and pay rates for the lower class.
PS. Go to sleep
Those are arguments based on semantics, because Bush was speaking in the context of neutralizing Al Qaeda's operational capability and Plume's name couldn't possibly have been "leaked" by anyone unless Wilson had already done so to the press (which he did in a sloppy attempt to discredit Bush). There's far more evidence that Hillary had Vincent Foster murdered, if you want to go down that road.Quote:
Originally Posted by Melf
Quote:
Originally Posted by g0zen
He did (Bush Sr)
Of course I do, but that's not going to change the fact the Iran fly's F-15's. WE sell weapons, we sell food. It's a bitch of a life we live.
Quick, somebody call Dan Rather, oh, wait....Quote:
Originally Posted by SpoDaddy
Equal rights? That was a bad answer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff_Pocoroba
I am.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff_Pocoroba
Okay, couple of things:Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff_Pocoroba
1.) The Byzantines are not Western.
2.) The state-on-state violence between Byzantium and the Ottoman Empire cannot be tied to the ideology of al-Queda or the global jihad movement. In fact, the version of Islam preached in the Empire is still considered the most moderate and tolerant towards non-Muslims.
3.) Omitted from the article is how Byzantium's OTHER biggest enemy other than the Ottomans was Western Christendom, who considered the Orthodox Church as much a heresy as Islam.
My point is Jihads have been a part of Muslim history for 2000 years. They just found a new enemy (I know you knew that, you stinker you)
Doublethink in action folks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff_Pocoroba
1984 reference aside.
You can't ascertain who's right and wrong by who sells weapons to whom.
We (the US) sold the Nazi's weapons in both WW'S, does that make us part of the atrocities that took place in Germany?
AQ was at one time the enemy of our enemy......
It's not as simple as that. The concept of 'jihad' (struggle) has been part of Islam since the time of the Prophet and the Rightly Guided Caliphs. What has changed is how that struggle is intrepreted; whether it's the inner struggle a Muslim confronts in day-to-day life, self-defense from an aggressor, or the forceful conversion or killing of all non-Muslims. It has been intrepreted and reinterpreted numerous times, and the jury is still out on which way is most 'right'. The fact is that most practicing Muslims don't obsess over jihad, they are more concerned with following the five tenets of their faith. The radical anti-modern, anti-western view of violent jihad is expressed by a minority of the minority.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff_Pocoroba