Claremont needs to pretend he died in the 80's.
Printable View
Claremont needs to pretend he died in the 80's.
I keep hearing this.Quote:
Originally Posted by YellerDog
It seems mainly true. Has he had a good story since comics were $1.99?
The correct phrasing of that question is- Has he had a good story? He's great at starting storylines, but can't end them to save his life. Sure, there might be a last issue in a mini-series or something, but there's always that feeling that nothing was resolved. I'm also sick to death of his writing style, and the way all his characters sound roughly the same.
James
The wolverine storyline says wsup.Quote:
Originally Posted by James
Personally, I liked that about him. He took years to develop subplots and storylines. It kept you coming back and anticipating. After he left the X-Men, the shitheads who followed mucked it all up in less than a decade.Quote:
Originally Posted by James
Yeah? 1982 says wsup.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chux
It's funny, I came into X-Men just after he left and also the Image guys left. I went back and read some of his stories and thought "Wow, why is everyone explaining their powers every three minutes and talking like a bad comic boo-- OH."Quote:
Originally Posted by Melf
Though I do admit to liking his X-Treme X-Men book, lame title aside.
The 2nd part of Gaiman's "Whatever Happened To The Caped Crusader" hits today.