An article about this type of subject should never use the terms 'pro-bono' and 'bonafid' in their finished copy.
It just makes me giggle.
An article about this type of subject should never use the terms 'pro-bono' and 'bonafid' in their finished copy.
It just makes me giggle.
Statistics please... I thought this way of thinking went away in the 80's.Quote:
Originally Posted by burgundy
According to wikipedia, 1 in 2000 for men, 1 in 1000 for women (assuming non anal sex).
Rape increases the chances do to the sex being voilent and often tearing shit.
To clarify...it's a .05% chance...if you're fucking someone who has AIDS
I still wouldn't fuck someone with AIDS.
I'm sure you do way more dangerous shit than fucking like every last single day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh
Sure. But multiplying the chance a chick has AIDS times .05% gives you ridiculously unlikely.Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor Ramon
Other shit is scary. AIDS really isn't.
Do you have a source to back up your .05% claim? At that rate, it would have disappeared a long time ago, so that's hard to believe, considering AIDS is still a growing problem and is widespread in several areas of the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by burgundy
Depends.Quote:
Originally Posted by burgundy
Quote:
Uncircumcised men were two to three times as likely to contract HIV from an HIV-positive woman as circumcised men (the risk varied a little depending on what assumptions the researchers made, for example about how many of the women were infected with HIV). They had about a 1.3 percent chance each time they had sex; circumcised men had only about a 0.5 percent chance.
Just speaking theoretically, what are the chances of contracting a disease if you sleep with a cute little blond spiky-haired man from Texas who you think might be made of magic?
15% chance of Pixie Syphillus. It's like regular syphillus but the tumor-like growths act like catapillar cocoons, from which tiny fairies will emerge after the proper gestation period.