Yep and I want mine back.
Yeah, I hear the same shit about how much better sex feels uncut.
But then I hear from every girl that I've ever met that they think uncut cocks are disgusting and they'd never suck one, and I feel a little better about having been savagely mutilated as a baby.
And for the record condoms are awful but if I was one night standing some chick I met at a bar I'd always wrap it.
I've never been shunned from a blowjob because I'm uncut. If that happens to you, you need better game.
Hey, dicks in general are pretty fucking goofy looking and I can't understand why anyone would ever want to suck one, but you damn well better believe I care what girls think of it.
As for girls, their "grossness factor" sure as shit determines if I go down on them, believe me. I won't just do that to any snatch that walks along.
...so what happened to the kid?
You can't legally force a kid to get his schlong chopped. Unless the father goes completely insane and ties the kid down and circumcises him with his teeth, I think the he'll be okay.
If I would have had to choose I would've gotten mine chopped anyway. Meh to each his own.
This is a circumcision video. It is NSFW so don't be stupid.
All I pretty much said was that the chances of getting HIV from heterosexual sex is basically nil. And no one responded with any worthwhile counterargument, just safe sex propaganda.
So then have you ever had sex with a woman who was HIV positive or are you just talking hypothetically that if you did, you wouldn't be worried about the risk of contracting it?
Rubbers also break. A lot.
eh this thread has just been down hill with the comprehension.
omg that circumcision video killed me in .2 seconds.
I went to a bris once. That was quite enough for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolemite
Right. Once again, please point out where I said Berg is telling people not to wear condoms. Because that sentence you bolded doesn't say that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechdeus
I understand where Berg is coming from- condoms suck (they do), the chances of getting AIDS from unprotected hedrosexual sex is slim, there are more common dieases worth bagging up over, etc.
All I'm saying it that, low chances of getting it or not, I place the chance of getting AIDS in the same category as getting the herps, or anything else. Actually, despite the chances of getting AIDS being far lower, the fact that it's usually fatal places it above those curable or non-fatal dieases.
Berg is just showing a somewhat cavalier attitude towards AIDS- yeah, the chances of getting it are real low, but I'm sure those hard-luck cases that got it thought the same thing as well. And yeah, with proper treatment you might live a long, long time, but who wants to live feeling like they're under the gun every day? For each guy or gal that lives for ages with HIV, there are people who get full-blown AIDS in mere years and die horrible deaths.
Low chances or not, unless I'm in a comitted relationship with someone I know is clean (and I am), I'm bagging that shit up no matter what. If Berg wants to make smart-ass comments about people who feel that way about AIDS, whatever. I'm not here to debate him.
I never agrued that fact (and you're right, it is a fact). The actual infection rate of unprotected penile-vaginal intercourse is about 10 out of 10,000. All I'm saying is that I don't want to be lucky Mr. 1-10.
I mean, dring a car is more dangerous, but I have an airbag and I make sure I have my seatbelt on. That's the most anyone can do.
Sex is a crap shoot, just like anything else you do in life. No matter what you do, somthing bad can possibly happen.
Lets settle this Marskitten is a girl right? So what say you, Turtleneck or Crewneck?
When did that happen?
Videos can be doctored. You need to observe the phenomenon in person.
You guys act like you've never fucked.
She's never fucked. She's a saint!
You stated Burg was being a bitch about this situation discussing STDs, went right into talking about him not wearing condoms, and then followed it up with a comment about him giving people shit for being careful. People aren't careful about STDs when they don't wear protection, thus the obvious implied meaning.
:lol: Right and you were just a gift from Lady Guadalupe or whatever God they have in Mexico.
Re-read the thread, pls
Berg is being a bitch in the sense that he's making snide comments towards people who think AIDS alone is worth bagging their shit up for, other wacky diseases notwithstanding.
And I've already said that if Berg prefers not fucking over wearing a rubber, whatever. That's his choice. Neither he nor I said that he runs around fucking everything in sight without a condom (and yeah, sex IS better bareback).
Next time read threads throughly before leaping to Berg's defense, especially when none is needed.
No need to, I already explained. Something does not have to use exact words to be stated, hence why I used the word that I did. You didn't mean that, fine, but you had a series of sentences which lead to a logical conclusion. The terminology of someone being careful in sex is almost exclusively in reference to condom/pill/etc. usage, and you stated:Thus, the word. I thought you meant general when you were referring to a specific angle thanks to lack of clarification or surrounding circumstantional placement. Retort?Quote:
But the guy is giving people shit for wanting to be careful.
Hey, look at the Synonyms of the word you used:
You assumed incorrectly. Thank you.Quote:
Originally Posted by dictionary.com
How many people, however few, regret contracting HIV through normal sexual intercourse? Yeah, all of them, if they even know they have it. If HIV were the only illness you could get from normal sexual intercourse, I'd STILL bag it up so I don't have to be one of those thousands of people who took their chances. I cannot see how I should be deemed irrational for that.
Some guy. I dunno.
http://www.ezbookclip.com/Images/turnpage256sm.JPGQuote:
otherwise let's turn the page
Yeah, I don't get it either, but the discussion is boring me.
How many people, however few, regret ANY UNLIKELY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE FROM AN ACTION DESPITE HOW REMOTE THE CHANCE OF SAID CONSEQUENCE MAY HAVE BEEN?
In other words, irrelevant.
I really want to be done with this topic. I only brought it up because I'm somehow a bitch because I can and choose to multiply small numbers together and learn something from them.
I don't care if it's progpaganda or whatever, it's not something you risk even if it's in the fractions of a percent. That is your life thrown away for one fuck. Wear a god damned condom or hey, better yet, why not stay with someone long enough to know their status before risking it? :-/
Yeah, I took a MEDT course here at school about HIV/AIDS (the whole class, not just a section). I've always been a a bit of a hypochondriac about things and have insane paranoia about STDs since I knew a 15 year old who contracted HIV from her second partner. That shit scares the hell out of me and I do not understand why people think it's safe to just sleep around so much.
And on topic, I hope I never have a son. I would not be okay making a circumcision decision and it completely confuses me as to why the US is so crazy for it.
Tain must hit it bareback.
Why not? You're the one who linked to dictionary.com for THE WORD.
Hey, it's not my fault you need things spelled out for you in one-syllable words.Quote:
I thought you meant general when you were referring to a specific angle thanks to lack of clarification or surrounding circumstantional placement.
See, this is what happens when you butt into other people's shit. I was talking to Burg, not you.
You're still kinda playing around where people are saying "I want to do this to protect myself during this course of action" and then you respond "Well why don't you just completely not do something?"
I would think a more reasonable response would by "Why don't you just get a no slip mat for when you take a shower" would be an accurate representation of your point of view.
Your responses are not Apples:Apples you're responding Apples:Oranges.
Thief Silver made a good point, and Burg made a ha-ha. I think this is a great, lighthearted note to end this fucking discussion on.
It seems like one of these threads crops up every few years or so.
Nothing of any consequence is ever resolved, except that it confirms the blatantly obvious: that men spend way too much time thinking about their junk.
Me, I'm perfectly happy with my great-looking, circumcised, disease-free cock, and have never had reason to be otherwise.
Well. Truth be told Sleeve.
I'm not happy with your disease-free cock.
Okay HIV chance is low, but, consider the transmission rates + pregnancy odds factored in.
The math
Pregnancy (not assuming she's on the pill, but do you trust her on that?) about 1/10
STD X
STD Y
STD Z
HIV 1/1000
----------
= Put a damn condom on. That or get tested with her, there's a ton of clinics that'll do it for free. That was you can bareback so long as she's on the pill and there's pretty much no risk so long as she doesn't sleep around.
Seriously getting tested is cheaper than getting treated for anything afterwards.
This conversation has gone on long enough.
Indeedy.
The fuck is this shit? If your girl is gonna suck your cock she's gonna suck it. Cut or unCut. There is no serious thinking about it unless your dick is dirty or something.
I already addressed that point.
And I can confirm it.
Bitches will say anything is disgusting, but once you put your hand down their pants, most shit is fair game.
Plus the turtleneck turns into the crewcut when at full mast, so really i doubt they notice the difference, other than more up & down slack on the shaft.
We're on the second loop. Awesome
And you don't need lube to jerk it.
who uses lube?
saw this on digg http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...70599481985716
Edit: forgot to add, it's from Penn & Teller's Bullshit! Program and WARNING: it is VERY GRAPHIC (not for weak stomachs and def NSFW)