If they charge $50 for 1/3 of a game, that's gay. It says each part "concentrating" on a particular race. Does this mean the other two are totally unplayable?
Printable View
If they charge $50 for 1/3 of a game, that's gay. It says each part "concentrating" on a particular race. Does this mean the other two are totally unplayable?
From what I understand the multiplayer is there in its entirety from day 1 and it's just the campaign that's split up.
That would really suck if each one is months apart as well for people who only play single player if somebody likes one of the later races.
Just means I have a reason to wait for the battle chest. It's a kick in the balls, and goes against everything Blizzard have done before. Staggeringly retarded.
Months apart? This is Blizzard were talking about. Im thinking years...Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyne
True. Considering they're saying each one has enough content to be it's own game and "plenty of cinematics".Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
This is beyond gay, but I guess they couldn't figure out how to plan expansions for this one so they just went this route.
No. They're just getting money hungry from WoW. Next thing they'll do is charge for Battle.net. They know their fanbase is as rabid as Mac fans. They'll throw money at them even if it means rape.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowutopia
I always dislike having to play the ones I don't like before my favorites, but I understand it for storyline reasons. I had no clue that it was gonna get worse. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyne
To clarify: http://kotaku.com/5062018/starcraft-...layer-campaignQuote:
"Effectively each game in the will be an expansion," Sigaty explained when I told him of our reader's initial concerns about buying the same game three times with a different single player component. Think Warcraft III's The Frozen Throne, or the original StarCraft's Brood War.