Sex with a Woman Who Is Drunk May Soon Be Illegal

It's not that much fun, really.

I fucked a girl who was passed out before. she loved it.

It's the trying not to get caught by the police afterwards that's fun.

Meh if she's not a virgin how's she gonna know.

I have a bad habit of jizzing in hair.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by burgundy

My main problem is that feminists want women to be able to dress and act and drink and even fuck like slags but then be treated as victims when they wake up. Can't have it both ways. I had no problem with the "women as victims" paradigm when women were expected to stay home and be generally be subservient to men. If women want equal rights, they have to accept equal responsibility for their circumstances and actions and consquences.

Obviously no one should be fucking a totally incapacitated female. But that's not where this thread started. People do tons of things when they're impaired that they have to face responsibility for. Except fucking, but only if you have a vagina. What bullshit.

---

this is the problem i see, and it bugs the hell out of me. i agree with you that equal rights should mean equal responsibilities. and i can't stand the girls who think they should be treated as superior just because they have a vagina. i've known girls who think they're smarter, cooler, better at video games, whatever, just 'cause they're female. so if this is so true, why does the law coddle them like they're helpless? why do women want to be coddled like they're helpless?

i knew this one fem-nazi who thought it was demeaning to have sex doggy-style. :rolleyes: so i always talked about how women are just sex objects and how "girls should bend over and take it like they're supposed to." it was a great way to piss her off, and she'd always get mad when her boyfriends agreed. lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thief Silver

You should be able to hit a girl without the idea that your punishment will be about 10x more serious, only on principle I'm not saying that people should get into fist fights with women (I'm not saying they shouldn't either).

---

I had a friend who was a feminist and was very outspoken about equality and how men and women should be treated the same. Then came the day when she was proud of herself for breaking up a fight between two guys, which happened solely because she stood between them and they refused to hit a woman. She didn't understand why I was laughing at her.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gir

equal rights should mean equal responsibilities.

---

Truth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MechDeus

I had a friend who was a feminist and was very outspoken about equality and how men and women should be treated the same. Then came the day when she was proud of herself for breaking up a fight between two guys, which happened solely because she stood between them and they refused to hit a woman. She didn't understand why I was laughing at her.

---

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

I, for one, welcome this law and look forward to it coming to The States. Women cannot be trusted. And women who are intoxicated, double. If the common men of our country are too ignorant to recognize this and carry on like uncivilized apes, they must be punished.

I've always said that the 21st and 19th amendments were the gravest mistakes this nation has ever made; and the passing of this law would be the first step in rectifying those blemishes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gir

Googles!

---

With the exception of the military stuff, which I'm gonna plead ignorance to (serious), sounds like a case of a bad judge or bad lawyer. As for the Cali cases, they probablly had notification, if not they can make a collateral attack (invalidating the entire case) for failure to serve, 6 month rule or not.

As for the bradey bill, that's congress' prerogative to make those laws, its not like men are an unrepresented minority with a history of discrimination. Don't like the law? Lobby against it. I wish you provided some case numbers, because I'm betting those cases were resolved after the article hit by a good lawyer coming forward to sue the woman, attorney general or enforcing body for either abuse of process + fraud (woman), defamation (in the case of being labeled a deadbeat dad) or filing for a declaratory judgment to stop them from taking the money once they invalidate the causation element.

But I've not taken family law classes so thats all i can think of off the bat.