I lived this way for years. I regret nothing.
Printable View
We should have a post your collection thread.
Flirting is natural, it's the man's job to make it progress further, not the woman's. If she's just a natural flirt and doesn't have any interest, use her to get other women. Also...
Get some self esteem. Treat women like if they behave, they might get a chance to suck your dick.Quote:
making him think he has a chance
Having a kid is way worse in every medical way than having an abortion. Shouldn't be my problem that sluts are dumb and then get drunk.
Because why have a right to have your fucking DNA private, right?
Female = can take a fucking pill
I don't think guys should cry about paying child support ever. It's not about the woman taking money from you, it's about the kid, and it's not the kid's fault his mom's a conniving bitch.
Double standards suck though. If a man does step up and wants to be a father, half the time he has to deal with all kinds of crazy bullshit to see his kid. And if he wants custody, the mother better have an arrest record a mile long.
LoL, privacy v. ending a fake parental suit in a week with virtually no cost? Male, use a condom, no guessing if the woman took a pill, lemme balance the burdens
Male, wear a condom or else pay child support for 18 yrs
Female, take a pill or else raise some dumb bastard for the next 18 years.
but sure if you want to live in a consequence free environment for men where women bare all the responsibilities fine. Remember the law favors women on this point and thats despite a male dominated legal system for the last 300 years.
i just farted
Thats nice, hi.
hi2uqt
Amuse Us Aurora and Peas, TNL's favorite couple.!
YOU WERENT SUPPOSED TO TELL ANYONE YET I WAS GONNA PROPOSE TO HIM IN THE "Sex with a Woman Who Is Drunk May Soon Be Illegal" THREAD :(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(
Now that it's been ruined, you can propose to me by inserting hidden messages into episodes of~ ~
!
Looking for friend with benefits. - 55
Reply to: pers-365316769@craigslist.org
Date: 2007-07-02, 6:45PM CDT
Country cowboy here, 55, 6'5", 180, very masculine, discreet, hairy, neatly trimmed beard, horny, uncut top with big appetite, stamina and repeat ability; however, don't have a big dick. Looking for younger(18-35), slim/skinny bottom boys for hot times. Send a face pic and your age, height and weight. A friend with benefits would be great. I enjoy touching/feeling, kissing, me fucking you, those work? Could be a regular thing. Email me for more details.
you cheating slut!
:( I was just trying to lure Korian into an illicit encounter. He won't answer my PM's.
ohhhh ok, all is forgiven
http://images.craigslist.org/0101090...74f600c4ba.jpg
found korian btw....
Scat Freaks in austin - 22
Reply to: pers-364961646@craigslist.org
Date: 2007-07-02, 11:20AM CDT
I am looking for a scat freak in the austin area, im into smearing feeding diapers and a whole lot more, i would not be able to host and would not eat unless we got tested at the same time, i am looking for something short or lt , but if your looking for lt we better be somewhat the same age, i have pics soo email me if your interisted. http://austin.craigslist.org/m4m/364961646.html
A dREAM cum true! I just hope he likes Ace Of Base.
Everyone likes Ace of Base. It's in the bible.
Females can take the pill after the drunk deed is done. Men can't put a condom on after. Well, they can, but they'll just look silly.
It's because of a paternalistic system that treats women like incompetents and children, which you, as a feminist, are espousing. I agree, I just don't have any sympathy.
Well generally if the kid lives in your house you're supporting him, and thus child support would be redundant.
For the record, my father fought for years to get custody of me, and I'm not sure he legally did until I had been living with him for like 5 years. My mother also never paid any child support, even though she was ordered to. It goes both ways.
Your post communicated that you have trouble with women, and then get mad at them when they turn you down. You also said "making him think he has a chance" which told me that you view women as the prize and those with the key to your sex life.
I'm not making fun or anything like that. Just passing on very hard earned knowledge.
raw dog in the butthole imo
There are no ovaries in the ass and mouth.
Still VDs.
Please enlighten me on where I said I am having trouble with women and got mad when they turned me down. I'm curous to see what you're seeing. I said it before, I'll say it again - the question I raised was simply to evaluate how "evil" MK was and to be used as an anecdote - not a personal question like the , "I have this friend who..." introduction that people use to reference their own problems.
I think you're reading into my post way too much - you studying Psychology in college or something? I appreciate your sharing of "hard earned knowledge" , but I'm pretty sure I've been with more women than you have. :)
Soldier on.
Ryan uses bitches up like kleenex. say word.
also: your mother
Treat women like your car. Clean her, wax her, throttle her and then trade it in after 2/3 years.
I keep my cars until they're so broken they can't function anymore.
also: bitches.
Somebody say Beatrice?
I shove three tubes worth of Rolos up my car's asshole and spend hours just watching them melt out.
i know this is off-topic a bit, but it keeps coming up...
the courts do favor women on this stuff, to an insane degree. federal laws regarding paternity exist to ensure a father—any father—is named right away. it's considered better to have an individual pay child support rather than the government. the 1986 bradley amendment, coded U.S.C. 666, prevents retroactive elimination of child support debt; once someone's deemed the father, they still owe even if they're killed, the children are independent adults, or if they're not the actual father.
washington times article on the bradley amendment
most states have limits (usually up to 60 days) on how long men have to challenge signed paternity docuents before being named the default father. courts generally won't recognize private dna tests, and even when a man involved in a paternity suit successfully requests court-ordered tests, the results are often ignored if officials decide it's in the child's best interest for the not-father to continue paying. having the child live in poverty is not in its best interests. the courts don't care if the not-father is living in hard times, can't support his own family, or if he's sacrificing college or a military career.
from: missouri's child-support cops won't take dna for an answerQuote:
Missouri and some other states have argued that the interests of the children require some men to continue paying child support even after a DNA discrepancy comes to light.
paternity law | paternity fraud
from: paternity fraud in the usQuote:
Fisher had a brief relationship with a woman eight years ago and when she got pregnant and told him he was the father, he believed her. He began paying child support but eventually fell behind. In the summer of 2001, the Maine Department of Health and Human Services took him to court because of delinquent payments. The court ordered him to pay up, and the state had his license suspended under the "deadbeat dad" law. That fall the girl, then 3, was placed in foster care. When Fisher pushed for custody, the state ordered a paternity test, which proved he wasn't the father.
At that point, one branch of the human services department told him he could no longer see the girl because he wasn't the father, while another said he owed $10,000 and couldn't have a driver's license because he was the father.
Fisher thought the matter resolved when a judge ruled he no longer had to pay child support in January 2002. But then last spring, the Maine attorney general's office claimed Fisher still owed support payments for the time from the child's birth until she reached 3 years old, when tests proved Fisher was not the father.
from: court denies taron james reimbursement of moneyQuote:
Despite subsequent legal appeals and an April, 2001 DNA test which confirmed that the child is not his, the courts have refused to set aside the judgment. In the years since the D.A. and later Los Angeles County Child Support Services have: seized James' tax refund for six years in a row; blocked him from renewing his notary public license, which in turn caused him to lose his job as the manager of a business; ruined his credit, denying him the chance to purchase the business at a low price when the owner offered it to him for sale; blocked him from obtaining a passport; and forced him to drop out of college before finishing his degree.
dna can get murderers off death row, but it couldn't overturn his paternity judgement.
anyway, the majority of child support judgements are made when the man is in default. that's what the child support agencies want, because their budgets depend on collection. independent investigations have proved that contractors hired to serve summonses often failed to get them in the hands of the accused father or lied about even trying.
from: usa today: men wage battle on paternity fraudQuote:
A 1996 federal welfare law requires a woman to name a father — no questions asked — when she applies for public assistance. A court summons can be mailed to the man's last known address. Many men don't get the notice. The result: The paychecks of 527,224 men in California, for example, are being docked under "default" judgments of paternity that can't be contested after six months.
from: missouri's child-support cops won't take dna for an answerQuote:
Back in 1992, Williams' former girlfriend applied for and received welfare benefits for the twins, which triggered the state's search for their father. Williams told a social worker then that he had doubts about the twins' paternity, and he asked her to schedule a blood test. "I just needed to know if [the children] were mine so that I could know how to adjust my life," Williams recalls. The state did not set up the paternity test, however, and took him to court.
Williams insists that he never received notice of a March 1995 paternity hearing. When Williams didn't show up, a default judgement declared him to be the father. He would pay $264 a month, a judge ruled. On top of that, Williams was ordered to reimburse the state for approximately $5,000 paid in welfare benefits to the children since 1992.
paternity fraud a problem for military men | paternity fraud | ideology still trumps science for feminists
there's an article that talks about taron james and paternity suits in the july 2007 maxim magazine. i found a lot of the original info there, but i know magazines are not the alpha and omega of all knowledge, so i did some research of my own.
most feminism is bullshit, and a lot of laws seem to encourge women to lie. it's scary what the law can do, and this isn't as uncommon as people seem to think. hey guys, isn't it nice to know that the courts don't care about your rights? they don't seem to equate ruining men financially with ruining their lives.
dna testing doesn't count as an airtight defense, so if guys don't want to be paying for sex long after ditching the bitch, they should get a vasectomy (and make sure it takes—you don't want to be physically capable of having children) and freeze their sperm in case they want kids later. treat women like objects, screw their brains out, just make sure you're shooting blanks.
I hate women.
Gir posts a bunch of stuff I wanted to but was too lazy to do. Thanks, I couldn't remember where to pull most of that from.
My main problem is that feminists want women to be able to dress and act and drink and even fuck like slags but then be treated as victims when they wake up. Can't have it both ways. I had no problem with the "women as victims" paradigm when women were expected to stay home and be generally be subservient to men. If women want equal rights, they have to accept equal responsibility for their circumstances and actions and consquences.
Obviously no one should be fucking a totally incapacitated female. But that's not where this thread started. People do tons of things when they're impaired that they have to face responsibility for. Except fucking, but only if you have a vagina. What bullshit.
You should be able to hit a girl without the idea that your punishment will be about 10x more serious, only on principle I'm not saying that people should get into fist fights with women (I'm not saying they shouldn't either).
I'd hit a woman under the same circumstances I'd hit a man, granted my circumstances are pretty much seriously fuck with anyone I care about. So it's a rule that's generally not pushed.
It really is on par with the original.
It's not that much fun, really.
I fucked a girl who was passed out before. she loved it.
It's the trying not to get caught by the police afterwards that's fun.
Meh if she's not a virgin how's she gonna know.
I have a bad habit of jizzing in hair.
this is the problem i see, and it bugs the hell out of me. i agree with you that equal rights should mean equal responsibilities. and i can't stand the girls who think they should be treated as superior just because they have a vagina. i've known girls who think they're smarter, cooler, better at video games, whatever, just 'cause they're female. so if this is so true, why does the law coddle them like they're helpless? why do women want to be coddled like they're helpless?
i knew this one fem-nazi who thought it was demeaning to have sex doggy-style. :rolleyes: so i always talked about how women are just sex objects and how "girls should bend over and take it like they're supposed to." it was a great way to piss her off, and she'd always get mad when her boyfriends agreed. lol
I had a friend who was a feminist and was very outspoken about equality and how men and women should be treated the same. Then came the day when she was proud of herself for breaking up a fight between two guys, which happened solely because she stood between them and they refused to hit a woman. She didn't understand why I was laughing at her.Truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by gir
I, for one, welcome this law and look forward to it coming to The States. Women cannot be trusted. And women who are intoxicated, double. If the common men of our country are too ignorant to recognize this and carry on like uncivilized apes, they must be punished.
I've always said that the 21st and 19th amendments were the gravest mistakes this nation has ever made; and the passing of this law would be the first step in rectifying those blemishes.
With the exception of the military stuff, which I'm gonna plead ignorance to (serious), sounds like a case of a bad judge or bad lawyer. As for the Cali cases, they probablly had notification, if not they can make a collateral attack (invalidating the entire case) for failure to serve, 6 month rule or not.
As for the bradey bill, that's congress' prerogative to make those laws, its not like men are an unrepresented minority with a history of discrimination. Don't like the law? Lobby against it. I wish you provided some case numbers, because I'm betting those cases were resolved after the article hit by a good lawyer coming forward to sue the woman, attorney general or enforcing body for either abuse of process + fraud (woman), defamation (in the case of being labeled a deadbeat dad) or filing for a declaratory judgment to stop them from taking the money once they invalidate the causation element.
But I've not taken family law classes so thats all i can think of off the bat.
I like how just because a few cases may be a minority in that type of event, it doesn't make it any less bullshit and obvious that the laws are incredibly fucked up.
I guess it's less about truth and more about finding someone to fuck over though, thanks for reinforcing those ideas Kitten ^.^
Throwing your wet towel on the bathroom floor after using it is a bad habit. What this is is being responsible.
Well the laws are technically there to protect the child from living in forced poverty. The problem is how one sided things seem to be getting. Although this is in Britain, so who knows what the fuck's even going on over there most of the time. It doesn't seem like congress is going to pass this under the same reasoning people here are taking issue with it.
So you're telling me it's perfectly okay for some horsefaced piece of trash to slip a man a mickey, fuck him without his consent and stick him with 18 years of responsibility he didn't ask for?
If you honestly believe that then fuck you.
Quote:
However, getting drunk does mean you're automatically consenting to everything done to you, ie rape. I mean if I stole your wallet while you were drunk, it doesn't mean you okayed the $3000 in charges.
This is pure horseshit and you know it. Next time you get drunk and some guy fucks you up the ass I'll be sure to blame you for being dumb enough to get drunk in the first place.
It's difficult to invalidate the entire case if the defendant/father was properly served, unless you've got clear-cut evidence of fraud. In a lot of these cases, fraud isn't all that easy to prove ("I swear, judge, this was his last known address!"). The problem is that few states have laws that protect victims of paternity fraud. As these articles show, most states make it cripplingly difficult if not outright impossible for victims to recover their losses.
We need tougher state criminal statutes punishing paternity fraud, and more prosecutors willing to pursue them.
Word.
Burgundy was talking about how women can remove all the effects of having non-consensual sex. WTF? Violating someone is fucking wrong and I hope all the douchebags that think there's nothing wrong w/non-consensual sex find themselves on the end of that some day.
gir got hotter while I was away.
should change name to Grrr.. imo
Woman Grounds. Like the coffee variety.
Mmm mmm! I just might have to change my morning routine.
p.s. http://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gif
That shit's gonna give somebody a seizure.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770
Here's an article of this year exposing the cold hard reality behind binge drinking and the erroneus claim of date rape drugs being used. The more shocking (but not shocking to any male who has any experience with women) tale it paints is of an entire sex unable to cope with the responsibility it was handed almost 90 years ago. Instead of ponying up to responsibility they blame a known predatory practice to excuse their lewd behaviour. I don't condone date rape, and that's not what I'm advocating. But if you're going to drink until you're pissing whiskey you should be smart enough to have someone to look out for you.
A lot of the shit feminist claim actually isn't an issue. Workplace sexual harrassment isn't actually based on forced inequality, either.
Moral of this thread: don't have sex while drunk. You're not making the best judgment calls and may regret it.
Ho's don't act right. There's Ho's on a mission and there's Ho's on the crack pipe.
I can't cum when I am drunk.
http://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gif
http://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gif
http://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gif
vhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gifhttp://www.electricbreakfast.com/lj/rape.gif
Seizuriffic.
You guys make me smile. This thread is way better now.
My browser has been raped in so many ways.
lol
Don't encourage him.
Sex with white women may soon be illegal for black men.
Again.
Were you driving in the car and then just suddenly like "OMG THIS WOULD BE FUCKING HALARIOUS"
Because that's what I did for the "ARE YOU OK? BUSTAWOLF" Pictures.
What the fuck is BUSTAWOLF?
...
Some gay video game shit.