This game looks better than Gears.
Printable View
This game looks better than Gears.
Better the Crysis? Definitely not. But there is no doubt this game looks better than Gears.
A game coming out a year later than Gears of War looks better? No way!
I can't believe someone is trying to throw Halo 3 in with these games. I love that angular ass tree in that screenshot. H3 is beyond underwhelming.
JM
In terms of art, sure, but in terms of the engine? No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Saint of Killers
Those trees look like the fell out of Daytona USA. Why would they put those in promo shots?Quote:
Originally Posted by JM
My eyes say yes. Crysis looks very good, but not nearly as impressive.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frogacuda
Do you have any idea how demanding that kind of dense vegetation is? There's a reason no other game does it in the same league. And, of course, all the particle effects (real volumetric smoke and clouds, of the sort that were in the original prerendered Killzone 2 trailer), cinematic motion blur, depth of field, full, dynamic soft self-shadowning, true volumetric shadows... You've gotta be kidding me.
Crysis when it ships will be the most advanced renderer in a game, period. You can argure style and atmosphere, that's a matter of taste, but come on.
I love the good art/bad art argument with the Prince of Blindness, Markryan
They don't give a shit I guess. People will buy Halo regardless of quality. Halo's single player game has always been rough (mostly due to poor level design) and it didn't stop anybody from making a big deal out of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frogacuda
yeah, but who was stepping up to the plate on consoles at the time Halo was released? It was actually the best looking console game around. The market it way too competitive for that shit to float now. I can think of 3 or 4 games that look better from this E3 alone, and I haven't really been keeping up.