I'm not saying you personally overrate games, I am saying as a whole, Play as a publication overrates a large number of games. All of the people who work for your magazine are representing Play as a publication, and not their individual selves.
Granted someone can choose to ignore reviews by specific people, that isn't how the average person who read the reviews (or simply view the scores) see them. For instance, when Play reviews are posted on message boards they aren't posted as "Bob Jimbo reviewed these games ::list scores::, shidoshi reviewed these games ::list scores::, Brand X reviewed these games ::list scores::", it is simply "Play reviews ::list scores::".
If the magazine was called "shidoshi", and you were the only person reviewing for the magazine, then yes, I would be wrong, but that isn't the case. There are a large number of reviews, regardless of who did the reviewing, that good/great scores were given to games that were simply marginal.
Of course reviews are subjective, but to sit there and give a game a 9 because the reviewer had "fun" with it without addressing the large number of other factors that go into reviewing a game is doing a disservice to all of the games that DO deserve those high scores.
I never said they rate the games highly because of the hype, I said they tend to rate games with a lot of hype highly. Which is absolutely true.
I am not making any judgment calls about any single person. I am making a judgment call about the publication, and I am absolutely allowed to do so. And if you read some other peoples opinions about Play, you would see that I'm not the only one who thinks this.

