Spo seems to think that they're actually seriously fighting.
Printable View
Spo seems to think that they're actually seriously fighting.
Was putting the word "fight" in quotes too subtle for you?
I guess you didn't read the entire second half of the article which was about him running for president.Quote:
Originally Posted by SpoDaddy
Actually it was about him not yet running for President.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thief Silver
The entire article makes a hell of alot more sense now that he's declared.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thief Silver
For or against, the subject was still about him running. Learn some reading comprehension. And some common sense Spo. You're wrong a lot of the time but you're still smarted than that.Quote:
Originally Posted by SpoDaddy
The subject and impetus for the article was his "fight" with the NY Times. That he mentions not running for President in the latter part of the article is secondary and you're smarted enough to know that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thief Silver
No, if you read the whole article the purpose for it was really about the running for President thing.
4 paragraphs of that huge article he wrote are about his "fight". The majority of the article is about the election.
THis could have easily gone in the other thread. Shut the fuck up about it you bitchy little girls.
There's only one girl whining that it shouldn't be in the other thread.
Merge plz.