Please enlighten us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brisco Bold
Printable View
Please enlighten us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brisco Bold
Nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Wait, are we talking about Middle East terrorist or gun control?
That response would be droll if it weren't for everyone saying the same thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
Since you won't answer, I'll assume it's the typical idiocy of making illegal guns more illegal and making unlicensed shooters more unlicensed.
I think these were bought legally. Gun control can work to reduce random killings of suburbanites, but will do fuck all for the Chicago-Detroit-Baltimore kids, which btw, dwarf the numbers of your precious middle class deaths.
We'll never agree on gun control, so let's just make it illegal to murder people. That'll stop those criminals!
I'd say do exactly what Australia did. Get rid of the guns. It worked there. Why do you think it wouldn't work in the States?Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
And the answer is obvious to everyone but many Americans because, as the study in the article states: "the association between national firearm ownership rates and number of mass shooters per country showed clear statistical significance."
But I'll assume your response will be the typical idiocy of not doing shit all because something-something-something/we're different and the best and above empirical data/something that has nothing to do with this issue/talking points. Or you'll just do what you always do and fuck off out of a thread whenever someone provides a modicum evidence countering whatever slogan you seem to be championing.
HOW DO THEY KEEP GETTING THROUGH THIS LOOPHOLE?Quote:
Originally Posted by GohanX
Japan is the answer.
Besides the fact that it's illegal and would require a 2/3 majority to change? Those are the legal obstacles. It's also a terrible idea.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brisco Bold
edit: I would also recommend looking up correlation vs. causation before talking about "empirical data."