I'd say if I had to, I could take on at least 30 5-year-olds. At least that's what this website says. :lol::lol::lol:
Printable View
I'd say if I had to, I could take on at least 30 5-year-olds. At least that's what this website says. :lol::lol::lol:
I only got 28.
I'm at 30 as well. I suspect that not fighting dirty squelched the crap out of my score.
I got 20. I'm small, but I fight dirty. Hooray hockey.
26.
This is so old.
I got 35.
I'm big, experienced, will not hesitate to fight dirty and use a child as a club.
LOL.. I guess if I were a little bigger, then we'd have the same score;)
I prefer scrappy myself. Or squirrellyQuote:
Originally Posted by Nomi
I went through selecting the probably best options, the max is 39.
31 Here. I see this becoming a TV reality/game show with the tag line of: "Are you tougher than some 5th graders?"
To bring some actual practical experience into this thread...
I've had about twelve-fifteen kids pile on my legs/back and drag me down to the ground. Age range was probably 5-12.
After I let them take me down they dog piled on top of me, then I bursted out of the melee, in what I thought was a reasonable approximation of the incredible hulk.
It wasn't very difficult and I'd say 30ish would be on the low side for most people.
:lol:
This thing tells me 26.
Bullshit. I could take over 100 of 'em.
I'm picturing that scene in Commando when the mall guards dogpile Arnold and he throws them all off like rag dolls.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kidnemo
I'd watch.Quote:
Originally Posted by NGEFreek
LOL 22 here
I was thinking of a different Arnold movie. Kindergarten CopQuote:
Originally Posted by Dolemite
They have the advantage of being in HD. You can't possibly see that many 5th graders coming in SD.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheebs
Pussy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonzo
28 for me.
lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by that site
27 for me.
33.
SameQuote:
Originally Posted by Timber
20.
On a related note, that site tells me I'm 81% addicted to Apple.
I got 29. Now I wish I had a martial arts background. I can kick a full 6' off the ground (about the entire length of my vertical body) in real life so this poll is entirely inaccurate.
Yeah but you're a nadkicker.Quote:
Originally Posted by icarusfall
Wow, I'm sad I only got 17. I'll blame it on my short stumpy arms.
Are 6 foot tall five year olds common in Canada?Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewbacca
If not than anything over 3 feet isn't necessary.
That's why it's 33 - it pays to be a bastard!Quote:
Originally Posted by PaCrappa
16 -- How the hell'd that happen?
Anyone who says they won't fight dirty has never been in a real fight.
30
tall, long teach, can kick over 3 ft, been over 8 fights and have no problems fighting dirty. Granted i have no martial arts experience, I'm just a dancer :/
How many real fights have you been in and what dirty fighting tactics did you use?Quote:
Originally Posted by bbobb
Only a couple. And dirty tactics such as kicking in the balls and kicking the shit out of them once they're on the ground.Quote:
Originally Posted by rezo
Ya think Todd Weeks fights dirty?!?!Quote:
Originally Posted by bbobb
WHAT IF THEY JUMP REALLY HIGH OR CLIMB THE BATTING CAGE? I'd be prepared.Quote:
Originally Posted by Timber
How does anyone not have the ability to kick over 3 feet?
lawl.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkRyan
Depends on the situation. Most fights don't get dirty because most of them aren't serious. A few shoves and punches here and there before everyone is tossed out. A lot of annoying yelling and even more annoying people who are trying to "keep things calm" but are also yelling. Those people make me kind of angry. They usually only escalate things. But yes, in dire straights everyone and anyone uses keys, nails, nards and hair pulling.Quote:
Originally Posted by bbobb
That's not dirty. That's you winning.Quote:
Originally Posted by bbobb
34. Fighting dirty, ftw.
20 kids.
And that's not a real fight.Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewbacca
Like I said.
Only 20? Are you not familiar with nadkicking techniques?Quote:
Originally Posted by SapphirePhoenix
30.
People have funny opinions on stuff related to fighting. ^_^
FYI - I just ate a whole bunch of marshmallows.
They were pretty good.
Kidnemo posting to a thread about fighting _____, ah, good. My watch is set.
Merry Crimmah!
I heard dog$ hates portables.
29, fighting experience and size were a plus, moral problems fighting kids was a minus. also, i love a good eyegouge, that and kicking kneecaps are good fun in a fight, soemtimes you miss those days.
22, I think I could take on more than that. I feel a real-life experiment coming on.
I got 37.
You lied.
27, and that's fighting dirty. What are these, some kind of Dawn of the Dead five year-olds or something?
16 for me, probably just because I was in Karate for a few years. I have a lot of experience fighting 5 year olds, they're pussies for the most part.
Who taught you guys to fight dirty? You don't kick on the ground, you stomp. Preferably faces. That wins against 5 year olds, one stomp per face, then maybe you can stem the tide as the come, thin out thier numbers and whatnot. Especially if you can knock down a bunch at the same time.
If you learn to punch like Indiana Jones you can knock out at least three full grown men with one punch.
Think of how many five year olds that translates to.
18? How did I score less than Nomi? I could take 18 of Nomi.
(No offense, pixie.)