I watch CNN and Fox, too, I was just using the most liberal example of the media I watch.
Printable View
I watch CNN and Fox, too, I was just using the most liberal example of the media I watch.
Even if it were true, why does it matter again?
It only matters in that its a verbatim talking point that undermines any argument Spo is trying to make on the subject.
And didn't McCain try to make Ayers the main crux of his campaign?
Oh, right, THAT failed campaign.
For that matter, the associations with Tony Rezco and Reverend Wright didn't really matter, either. How did Obama handle things like this? Oh yes:
And to sum up the Biden/Palin bias thing:
Biden = 1 stupid thing / 20 interviews
Palen = 1 stupid thing / .20 interviews
And you can't argue it's because no-one's interviewing her (she restricted it a lot) or that it's because of the liberal media elite (not even FOX NEWS can make her look smart).
LOL @ blaming the "liberal media." She sure doesn't seem to feel that way now, as she's given more interviews in the last week than she did during the entire campaign. Hell, she even invited them into her home and COOKED FOR THEM.
The whole bias thing is a sad excuse to cover how completely unprepared Palin was to be VP. She's as insincere as she is stupid if she thinks people - and the press - are going to forget that by 2012.
It's true that it's a talking point (I was saying it here before McCain started using it as a talking point). It's also a true statement. Ayers suggested that Obama run for office, and got him started by holding a fundraiser in his living room to introduce Obama to Chicago's power brokers. That's a fact. I never said I thought Obama agreed with Ayers' views (I don't), but rather that he used Ayers to launch his career.
What's wrong with Ayers again?
And how is Ayers relevant to the Obama of the present again?
I took a lot of shit for defending Palin on the "Is Africa a country?" allegation, particularly when Martin Eisenstadt was brought into the picture:
But lo and behold:
Well, well, well...Quote:
MSNBC Retracts False Palin Story; Others Duped
NEW YORK -- MSNBC was the victim of a hoax when it reported that an adviser to John McCain had identified himself as the source of an embarrassing story about former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, the network said Wednesday.
David Shuster, an anchor for the cable news network, said on air Monday that Martin Eisenstadt, a McCain policy adviser, had come forth and identified himself as the source of a FOX News Channel story saying Palin had mistakenly believed Africa was a country instead of a continent.
Eisenstadt identifies himself on a blog as a senior fellow at the Harding Institute for Freedom and Democracy. Yet neither he nor the institute exist; each is part of a hoax dreamed up by a filmmaker named Eitan Gorlin and his partner, Dan Mirvish, the New York Times reported Wednesday.