Originally Posted by
youandwhosearmy
Thats both fine and logical. So wouldn't the people who you can make a difference in their misery, come before the people who you couldn't?
Realistically I'm talking about. If you could do something to save someones job, would you not do it because he wouldn't be as worse off as the starving children of Africa, or would you admit to yourself, short of dedicating your life to fundraising, and working in international programs, that you can't really do much but be outraged about the starving children of Africa, and help save the guys job?
I'm not seeing the implications here that tell me I can't worry about the workers (at all) in America because there are things that are bad in other places.