Popular Opinion of Skilled Gamers
I figure TNL would be pretty jaded enough to give some decent street-level opinion on this.
I've been feelin' the vibe for awhile, then that AVGN ZP debate followed by the guy's recent Smash review kinda summed it up enough to be worth asking.
Do you respect the gamer or look down on the gamer when he/she decidedly kicks your ass at something?
This is not to mean like losing to a guy who plays a single title 80 hours a week, is in a clan, and puts out replays. I'm saying people who may have taken time to read the manual or put 8 hours into a game during the first week of owning it, if those types of gamers are kicking your ass at something, do they really become "that guy?"
---------------------------------------------------
If ya want the tl:dr version:
I remember my elementary school days of the late 80s when NES was starting out. I could tell you flat-out I was way more into gaming than I shoulda been, but I could also tell you just about every single person from friends to family really hated on me if I'd beat them hard on any game they chose. And even then, finding anybody to run multiplayer with on anything from a large group of friends even amongst themselves was a very rare occurance from then until the Goldeneye days. But even then, that was a fad along with a few other titles, then people graduated high school and nobody really did much of the gaming thing after that. Even me.
Now, the late 80s to mid 90s I observed public view of gaming as flat-out for dorks 'n nerds only. Then through PS1 and through into the first Halos, I saw that the general public and friends alike eased off the whole anti-gaming thing and more people I knew would even own a console and dabble in the shit. When I'd win at games I didn't even own, I'd get handed a beer, not social-status insults.
Nowadays about through the PS2 times up to this year after the Wii, I feel like another semi-cultural shift kinda went down behind the scenes. While the population of known gamers is the highest it has ever been, I've noticed the overall difficulty of many games has dropped a ton, the game journalists have degraded in skills according to their reports of what is hard* (usually with humor-based reviewers adding a stab at players who can throw-down in games they can't), and then you got the usual cloud of whining from many-a-forum-places matched with online-play griefers or other very, very sore losers on the online games. Yeah, I know when it's playin' online, that's expected. But the kicker is, even offline, if a group of people and I end up getting a game going in whatever from Wii Bowling to shit I don't own, If I win a few I'll start to hear the 23-year-old updates to whatever insults kids would throw on a 1988 playground. And I was like, "what the hell it's just a game." And this is all even when I'm playin' like an eighth of what I used to way back then..
*The recent examples I could throw from memory are the Zero Punctuation Smash Brawl review where Yahtzee degrades himself for putting 10 hours in a game before playing with friends, 1up's Omega Five review, and AVGN actually calling Super Mario 3 Hard. 'Could prolly find others but to hell with research..
So on the street level, in your eyes, are video games a legit medium for hosting occasional gatherings or for legit friendly competition? Or has the reputation of video games been brought back down to that of say playing darts at a bar or goin' bowling without the Big Lebowski references: "fun to do, but if you're noticeably really good, people ask what's wrong with you?"
Bonus Question: Do any of you know of any game reviewers that are known to actually be good at gaming? I've dumped more bills on misleading opinions than I'm happy with.