This is a good point and honestly I do agree that it is incredibly lopsided. Gates is good, sure, but he's not a starting Running Back in the least.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
Printable View
This is a good point and honestly I do agree that it is incredibly lopsided. Gates is good, sure, but he's not a starting Running Back in the least.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
I'm waiting for more opinions, but so far no one who is impartial has said it was fair besides Geo. Rich, bbobb, and I all disagree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff
Whatever, ask Rico if I did anything but offer this trade with no added text or pm's or emails, when he says no, you should step down. It's not your job to act on every god damn thing on this league, and to change the scoring without asking. It's your job to police the league if somebody comes to you with evidence of collusion.
So you would punish me for offering a trade which was accepted because you don't like it? Rationalize that for me.
Brown + Williams Week 1: 13.3 points
Gates+Thomas week 1: 17.6 points
You have nothing to go on but your assumed idea of what is right for fantasy football, and since you have not won since I have been playing, I'd say you should just move along.
This is what it says in the box if I chose to veto this trade:
It has nothing to do with proving collusion. 14 people paid $35 to play in a fair league. I don't like that we have owners who put that in jeopardy through their own ignorance, but we do, and it is my job to uphold the fairness of the league.Quote:
Originally Posted by ESPN.com
You have no right to veto a trade when I have just shown you that projected scoring shows that Gates and Company will outscore brown and williams.
But I guess if you're afraid my team will stomp your team's ass, then I see your point.
I can't fucking believe we are even having this conversation, he accepted a trade I proposed, it's not like I fucking offered him McFadden for LT and Michael Turner.
Romo is projected to score 40 this week. Can I change whatever to he does score to 40 on Tuesday morning?
I just saw this and when I saw that trade. I thought it already went through and I thought it was one sided. BUt then I was like well what can you do it already was approved.
Now I see this. It is a bit one sided and by bit I mean grand canyon.
Then again ... they both agreed to it. So, its really the fuck up of the loser in this trade.
If anyone thinks Biff is a better fantasy player than I am, I'd like to hear that too. There's certainly no evidence of it in any prior season.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff
Biff, you're trading a TE (yes, he's one of the top tier TE's, but he's still a TE) and a #3 RB for a #1 RB and a #2 RB... yeah it's lopsided. Talking one weeks worth of scoring and projected scoring is silly.
Make that 4-to-1 saying it is lop-sided from those not directly involved. I'm just going to let the league vote on whether it is too lopsided or not. That way Biff can STFU about me being afraid of his team that's never advanced further than mine. So far, we have...
Fair
Geo
Too Lopsided
Rich
bbobb
Advocate
I won't even vote so you have nothing to whine about.