It was revealed yesterday that she had her boobs removed three weeks ago, what a shame. At least she will have some new ones in 6 months!
http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n...iography_2.jpg
Printable View
It was revealed yesterday that she had her boobs removed three weeks ago, what a shame. At least she will have some new ones in 6 months!
http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n...iography_2.jpg
Let us all mourn this horrible, tragic loss.
In Hollywood, boobless = jobless.
I grew up with those boobs, I will miss them dearly.
This thread is disgusting.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
I'm just thankful for the time I had with those boobs, R.I.P.
also, great pic Netwurked.
At least she didn't asscheek cancer.
Poor Christina's boobs. :(
I guess this answers my "is there a god" question.
Bright Side: At least she got to have them during her prime years. She probably would have gotten them enhanced as the years went on... this is just a way of speeding that process up.
What has she done recently?
I'd have called Playboy and done a little shoot before saying bye, but that's just me.
She should sell them on ebay.
I'm gonna cry whenever I watch Married With Children from now on.
How sad for her. :(
I knew someone who had their boobs removed because of cancer, when she got fake ones they tattooed the nipples on. I thought that was kind of strange.
Well there goes my nipple tattoo idea.
Instead of a car.
You can't titty fuck a car.
I hate Hollywood tripe news, but this is good for cancer awareness. Although it's not like breast cancer really needs awareness these days, and the survival rate is pretty high too. How about lung cancer? That kills more women alone than breast cancer does. I guess lung cancer isn't as sexy as boobie cancer, though, so I see the problem.
You mean smoking cigarettes causes cancer? HOLY SHIT STOP THE PRESSES
Smoking: Titty fuck your Lungs
sweet sweet carolina smoke > lung filth
I'm pretty sure Razor was joking there, but yeah cigarettes contain carcinogens that serve as both initiator and promoter so regardless whatever way you try to twist it they do directly cause cancer.
Factored in with normal lung cancer rates though, the chances are much lower then the anti-smoking groups promote. I'm not trying to say they're healthy, but there's a lot of misleading evidence.
Smoking bans are bullshit too. PA recently passed one that will go into effect soon. I always though the state governments should offer tax breaks to establishments that don't allow smoking, that way if you want to go to a smoke free bar or restaurant, you will have your choice and so will the smokers.
Gohron: I take it that you enjoy smoking, but I disagree about the "misleading evidence." You should look at the numbers on the incidence of lung cancer in the US during the 20th century. Here's a graph from the National Institute of Health (I just took it from Wiki though, so...). I'm not a statistician and I'm certainly not going to do the math on this, but I'm pretty sure that this graph shows a strong correlation between smoking and lung cancer.
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/board/a...1&d=1219385606
I don't know how I feel about that second part of your post. I mean given that half a million people die from lung cancer a year I'd think that it's a good thing that the government finally decides to step in.
I don't really smoke much anymore and I'm not denying that their is a direct correlation between the two. I was simply saying that smoking was less contributing to lung cancer then anti-smoking groups make people believe.
I don't, nobody is forced to smoke cigarettes or be around them (in most cases). If they let people drive motorcycles without helmets, they should stay away from smoking laws as well (or at least complete abolishment in the public realm).
So basically contaminated vegetables are perfectly ok to sell in a supermarket as long as they're properly marked since nobody is forced to buy or eat them. Gotcha. (vegetables aren't addictive either, last time I checked)
Regarding the statistics thing, let's just put it this way: my Biology of Cancer professor stated time and time again that without the tobacco industry, cancer researchers would be out of a job.
Anecdotal Evidence: In the 4 years doing my job I have treated like one person with lung cancer that a)was not once a heavy smoker, or b)was in a profession in which they were exposed to smoke.
You're a fucking moron if you don't think almost all lung cancers are caused by smoking.
And Andrew, when I did oncology in University (and I'm sure it's the same) prostate cancer and breast cancer kill more people (atleast in Australia) than lung cancer. The survival rates in prostate cancer and breast cancer are MUCH higher than lung cancer, but so many more people get breast and prostate cancers than lung cancer (cause only some people are stupid enough to smoke).
Smoking bans are the best fucking thing ever.
i agree! a few years back when I was still a bouncer, people used to give me shit all the time when I would tell them they couldn't smoke inside. Then I'd have the ass hole's that I would have to tell numerous times that they couldn't smoke inside, that I would just walk up without a word, snatch that shit out of their mouth and then go back about my business
I was against smoking bans for all the obvious reasons.
And then my state implemented it.
And I found out what I was missing.
BOOBIES, PEOPLE!
BOOBIES!
*escorts the smoking conversation to the front door and bangs its head on the wall next to the door on the way out*
Smoking bans make sense, don't get me wrong but when a good percentage of the population smokes, I think it's going a little too far to abolish it in public completely. Like I said, offer tax breaks to establishments that ban smoking and give people a choice of where they want to go.
Wrong. Fuck it. Go outside.
Yeah, public health hazard vs. less drinks sold. Go outside.
Fuck public health, if people have a choice between smoking and non-smoking (establishments, not sections) then what's the big deal? Our culture seems to think that we're all on a high-horse for eliminating smoking though we leave so many other bad habits unchecked.
Maybe we should start worrying about the growing levels of pharmaceuticals in the water or abolishing nuclear weapons instead of getting rid of smoking in public places in places where everyone wants to smoke.
tities
Rest easy! It won't apply to most bars. If their food sales make up 20% or less of the money they pull in, they can still allow smoking. Though the ban is in the minds of many already. When I went to my favorite diner at home, I noticed no one was smoking, even though it's not in effect yet. And call me crazy, but as someone who wasn't smoking, it was... kinda nice. Never thought I'd be saying it.
Isn't finding a place that allows smoking your problem now?
That is delightful.
I like how Gohron is speaking for the masses of smokers. He's their champion.
His plan doesn't sound unreasonable. The problem here is that people are never willing to compromise. They always want it their way no matter what.
The side that loses always wants a compromise.
Or the side that is Democrats. One of the two.
You can't smoke inside at clubs in Canada anymore (Or anywhere inside for that matter). They've also taken any cigarette memorabilia out of the convenience stores so kids will have to actually ask for it in order to get it (their theory is out of sight, out of mind). As a non-smoker I'm happy about it because everything is cleaner. I don't come out of a bar wreaking of smoke for 2 days now. Smoking is something the affects everybody inside, so no, you shouldn't be allowed to smoke in a club, Gohron. Especially since waitresses and bartenders also deserve clean air, and not dying in 40 years from inhaling smoke from you idiots who can't walk outside for 4 minutes.
What I don't like is the idea of a ban on smoking at personal residences or in cars, which is what some non-smoking groups are talking about doing. What I do in my own house is none of your fucking business and a basic human right that I will not give up. Public restaurants and places are the extent of where people shouldn't be allowed to smoke.
Yeah, I'm not a fan of that obviously. Ban smoking altogether if you're going to do that.
I don't feel smoking should be banned anymore than pot should be in personal residences and general outdoor settings where safety isn't endangered. The argument here is that eventually, if I'm a smoker, I will be selling my house and the guy/family who comes in next will now be open to hazardous vapors and chemicals from the years of smoke in the carpet/walls, etc. But it's not like a heavy smoker can mask the smell of that smoke in their house very well, and if you're dumb enough to buy that house from them without realizing work needs to be done to make it livable it's your fault. You should know that you're going to have to repaint the walls and steam clean the fuck out of the carpet. That's a responsibility you've undertaken for yourself based on a house you like enough to do it for.
Shit like this stems from the fact that for some reason people in the west in the modern generations don't seem get it through their heads how important it is to uphold personal freedoms for their citizens, and how long it took to get these freedoms from under the rule of pushy dictators or nanny governments. Basically their idea is "If you're not doing anything wrong then you won't mind!" But that's bullshit. Prove with evidence that I am doing something wrong before violating my rights as citizen. The idea is so simple yet lost on many. Maybe it's because of how much fear is pumped over the TV these days. I don't know.
This is why I think there should be smoking places and non-smoking places, even if it was an uneven ratio. 20% of the nation smokes, so maybe a State should figure out a way to allow 20% of public businesses to allow smoking, that way, all the non-smoking people would have plenty of places to go, while the smokers would have their few places to go.
I say alot more than 20% of the country smokes.
I say at a fucking punk show I should be able to smoke indoors you bitchy little faggots.
Your mom.
I say if you step outside for your wank then everyone can enjoy the establishment and only the people who want to breath smoke can breath it. Isn't that easier than segregating random shops and searching town for some place accommodating?
Seriously is it really that hard to go outside and smoke?
Fucking going to bars is so much nicer now. Mind you this is coming from some one who smokes from time to time, its not a regular habit for me but once every couple months I feel like it.
The push to ban smoking in cars and houses is partly what Drew described, but it's also one of those things meant to protect children. I don't smoke and I don't give a fuck if you do, but I do think if you smoke in a car with a kid strapped in it's baby seat you should probably have your balls chopped off and fed to you anally.
this.
Mesa Arizona was one of the first large communities in the US to ban smoking, at the time people referenced the fact that banning smoking was one of the supposed first measures the Nazis took to promote good public health.
That said, now that I've experienced smoke free public areas, there is no turning back.
SMOKERS CAN GO FUCK THEMSELVES!
You fucks are so clouded by your addiction that you have little consideration for those around you.
God damn assholes step 2 inches outside a door of a restaurant or shopping center and light up your fucking stink stick, then huddle around the entrance welcoming all who come near with your aire of putridness.
Fucking leaving your cellophane wrappers to blow freely in the wind, dropping or flicking cigarette butts whereever you please. You don't think that shit is litter?!? Just like you don't think your smoke is an affront on my personal space.
My apartment building doesn't allow smoking indoors; so instead, addicts stand near the mailboxes or at the curb. As soon as I arrive home and open my car door the poison odor of cigarette smoke is there to greet me.
On one account Gohron is right: municipalities should provide a location for addicts to partake in their pleasure. Just like a dog park, all the tobacco, crack, and heroin users can congregate at the park down by the river and wallow in each other's filth.
lol
He's right though. I'm sick of cigarettes.
Remember when you used to be punk?
Yeah... I did a lot of stupid shit I regret. Smoking cigarettes for a decade was one of them.
It's all pregnancy seminars and sweaters from here out...
I don't believe in sweaters.
Who is that, Bret Michaels?
Look what the cat dragged in.
don't be so naive
addicts getting their fix
RIP (.) (.)
I'd say a good portion of that is either white trash or people who turn around and sell them at a lower cost to turn a profit, like the mob does
either way, this ain't the thread for that discussion it's about mourning the loss of christina applegates capital knockers
Why don't people just smoke outside and shut the fuck up?
Because we're Nihilists and don't give a fuck about you.
Remember when this thread was about Christina Applegate's dearly departed boobage?
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/media...5/38369042.jpg
yes those
and the fact that they've been surgically removed.
Not only tragic, pretty horific, too.
Leave it to TNL to make fun.
shut up, hippie.
I wonder how many people that are against smoking anywhere, are also for abortion, or gun control, or against the death penalty, or blah blah blah.
Can we stop making a huge deal out of everyone staying alive? Seriously? OH NO PEOPLE MIGHT GET HURT!?!?! Whatever.
i want to go back to the 80s where the world around me wasn't insane and I got to watch ghostbusters all day and play with rock lords.
Someone getting an abortion doesn't give me a headache or make my clothes stink, so I don't give a fuck about that.
whats next? No farting in public?
First they came for the smokers but I said nothing...
When one stops smoking cigarettes one notices all kinds of shit about the people that still do.
I regret nothing.
You have outside, thats a large area, enjoy it.
And you don't think smoke inside would turn off any potential customers?