Nah, it's just that the candidates are all terrible but I'm fucking awesome.
Printable View
I'm trying to figure out how we got to the point where the American Republicans are considered "fiscally conservative." Wouldn't a return to the traditional Keynesian economic principals that our economy was built on be conservative? And a push to unproven Austrian school economics be liberal/radical? Just because social conservatives align themselves with these policies doesn't make them "fiscally conservative."
Also:
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/tnl/att...1&d=1454598369
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/tnl/att...1&d=1454598369
It's simple: conservatism = conserving property = keeping money where it is = keeping everyone else in their place.
Attachment 78308
You've got to be fucking kidding me...
Attachment 78309
...that's more like it.
There was no "Ted Cruz is a creepy scumbag and I would never vote for him" option. That has to be the reason.
I understand the quadrants, but being a social libertarian and not an economic one just reeks of "I want to be able to do whatever I want, but I want someone else to subsidize it."
edit: Or, maybe even better, "I don't want the government in my business unless it's taking care of me."