Election Thread 2016

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Doc Holliday

this is the exact thing I was saying a while back about how the 'privilege' argument was one designed to protect the 1% by occupying the energy of the middle class to fight within themselves.

---

That is true but I don't know how to fix it.

Sore Losers Want Chaos

.

. .

. . .

Click for full size


Click for full size


Click for full size

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fe 26

eh, decision sets are limited constructs that never account for all possible options.

---

So what's the probability of a coin landing on its side? How did you calculate that?

I'm more worried about the feds taking 40% of it than it landing on its side.

http://www.the-nextlevel.com/tnl/att...3&d=1458394984

The remaining 60% probably got split by a greedy ex-wife.

I would say that it would be good if Trump and Sanders ran as independents, but since you still use the stupid ancient first-past-the-post bullshit, it would be catastrophic for either "side".

Sanders is not going to run as an independent.

If the GOP fucks over Trump in the convention and gives the nomination to Paul Ryan or some shit, he might. He has always said he would not do it as long as the party treats him fairly, and I'm not sure how a neutral observer could see those shenanigans and think it's fair.

I think he would gladly spend a few months running as an independent to get revenge on them.

Maybe Republicans should have a serious talk about who they want more, Kasich or Clinton, and Democrats should have a serious talk about who they want more Sanders or Trump/Cruz?

National polls remain nonsense at the moment.

I don't think general election matchup polls are that helpful right now.

Actually I don't think they are that helpful during the general, but that's another story.

OK, increasingly nervous man, let's go local. in conservative Mormonland, Trump Rally Smashes Sanders! no wait...