I cant rep you again right now but i want you to know that I care <3Quote:
Originally Posted by A Robot Bit Me
Printable View
I cant rep you again right now but i want you to know that I care <3Quote:
Originally Posted by A Robot Bit Me
Like in the Howard Beale sense?Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
It might have been politically expedient. Moderation doesn't seem to fly in the way it used to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Calliander
If "moderation" is the new euphemism for oligarchy tug buddies, no. A decade of their aggressive foreign wars and bank bailout while the income gap widens made aristocrats less likable.
Attachment 79575
Is the point of this to say that Hillary hates women? Or feels malice toward them? What?
Dude she was doing her job.
This, too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diff-chan
But like, this didn't get dug up until now? I don't recall ever hearing about it until whenever Assmouth began talking about it. So clearly, bringing it up isn't about justice for that young woman - which sucks because she may actually have her hopes up that people are genuinely interested in her situation.
And then, this particular incident proves that she dislikes women?
Those are some logic leaps I'm not willing to take.
It's that Abe Lincoln brand political two-face two-step she's so fond of. Tell the feminists what they want to hear, while laughing it up with a reporter about how easy it was to get a rapist a plea bargain.
When you have 4 years of feminists and the media losing it over things like a scientist with half naked women on his shirt and revealing girl costumes in video games, coming back and supporting an apathetic rape defense lawyer is disingenuous .
So it's that she isn't a feminist?Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
Then we are at an impasse, as I feel calling Clinton an apathetic rape defense lawyer is disingenuous and both of us are making these judgments off of the same information.Quote:
supporting an apathetic rape defense lawyer is disingenuous.
Like Darren Wilson? Cool.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diff-chan
Did you read the case? The girl was raped. How much was the 15 year old and how much the 41 year old Hillary defended is up for question. 2 issuesQuote:
Originally Posted by Calliander
1) the evidence of his underpants were tampered with, with the section of cloth with the girl's blood removed, she took the remaining underwater to an independent investigator to prove they were clean. How is that remotely ethical?
and 2) even if she was doing her job to defend a rapist, how is it ethical to laugh at getting a rapist off regardless of how incompetent the prosecution is? All while celebrating what a champion of women you are to get elected and condemning your opponent for the same things you defended when it was your job to do so?
How can you just swap your morals every time it benefits you?
Like this. It's cool to take money from Saudi Arabia to benefit you, while at the same criticize them for funding ISIS.
Attachment 79576
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/11/leak...upported-isis/
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/21/us...n-charity.html
Before anything else, let me ask: What is the end game on the "Hillary is unethical" tack? To convince people to vote for Trump? Or merely to point out the disgust at people being angry with him for something that some people feel is on par?
No it's not. She's the victim.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
Okay, so you think she tampered with it. I don't.Quote:
1) the evidence of his underpants were tampered with, with the section of cloth with the girl's blood removed, she took the remaining underwater to an independent investigator to prove they were clean. How is that remotely ethical?
You're taking the laugh as gloating or unconcern. I don't.Quote:
and 2) even if she was doing her job to defend a rapist, how is it ethical to laugh at getting a rapist off regardless of how incompetent the prosecution is? All while celebrating what a champion of women you are to get elected and condemning your opponent for the same things you defended when it was your job to do so?
We ain't gonna see eye to eye on this one, baby.
I want people to vote 3rd party. (Yes, I know Johnson & Stien aren't good choices but before we can get a good third party canidate, the third party has to show potential for viability) We are here with this shit show, because the 2 party system gives us lower standards by having no incentive to achieve any higher than just above the opponent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Calliander
I also want people to think critically and hold both candidates to the same standard regardless of team affiliation.
There were two men who had sex with Shelton that night, a 15 yo and Taylor the 41 yo who gave them both alcohol. The 15 could have been consensual, but as she was hospitalized and her blood was on Taylor's clothes, his was without a doubt, not.Quote:
No it's not. She's the victim.
She didn't tamper with it. And it may not be criminally tampered with, but she took clothes to her independent investigator to examine wether they contained the victims DNA, knowing damn good and well the part with the blood stains had already been removed. Sure it might be legal in Arkansas, but it's dishonest as fuck.Quote:
Okay, so you think she tampered with it. I don't.
sure we can, I just have to get Hillary to defend sexist Yale Halloween parties for it to work.Quote:
You're taking the laugh as gloating or unconcern. I don't.
We ain't gonna see eye to eye on this one, baby.
That's fair enough. You won't get the "throw your vote away" argument from me. Hoping to get people thinking critically in a country that caters to confirmation bias, though, gets a Bender laugh out of me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
That's fine, too.Quote:
Sure it might be legal in Arkansas, but it's dishonest as fuck.
Ha! Doubtless she had her turn in at least one offensive costume back in her day.Quote:
sure we can, I just have to get Hillary to defend sexist Yale Halloween parties for it to work.
You can be a feminist and defend a rapist in a court of law. If you believe feminism is about equality and being a good lawyer is judged on the merit of winning cases then there should be no expectation other than getting the case thrown out or winning. Any man wouldn't have been given a second thought after winning that case.Quote:
Originally Posted by Calliander
I don't believe Hillary gives a shit about feminism btw. But her MO is playing to identities of different groups... so here we are.
Doc, I don't know if you're being intentionally dense or you just don't understand what happened in this case.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
The state failed to preserve the portion of the underwear with the semen sample for testing. That means the state committed a very serious disclosure violation. When she confronted the state with this violation, they offered a plea agreement to a less serious charge.
If you have to blame anyone, blame the state of Arkansas and whatever agency was responsible for preserving evidence.
she didn't get him offQuote:
and 2) even if she was doing her job to defend a rapist, how is it ethical to laugh at getting a rapist off regardless of how incompetent the prosecution is? All while celebrating what a champion of women you are to get elected and condemning your opponent for the same things you defended when it was your job to do so?
he still plead guilty
reading comprehension is key
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Of which he served ten months in jail, not prison. Of course I'm not the lawyer. Ten months in jail is probably a more severe sentence than 30 to life.Quote:
The charges against Clinton's client were dropped from first degree rape – which carried a 30-years-to-life prison sentence – to unlawful fondling of a minor.
In other news: Trump is caught paying off the media for coverage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFoElKm7Neg
Doc, stahp.
Like Kathy Shelton's uterus stahped working after that raping?
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/tnl/att...chmentid=79578
Yo, tnl. I'm going to let this Election finish, but Obama Declares War on Russia!!
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/tnl/att...chmentid=79579
I wonder if US hackers have found Putin's cache of pictures of him masterbating to a picture of him masterbating into a full length mirror.
Is Hilary going to give you dumb cunts universal health care if she gets in?
You don't know any 50 year old republicans irl, do you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Calliander
They have been talking about this shit since Bill was president.
I guess I don't! Aside from cigars and bajingos I only knew about the kill list or whatever it's called up until recently.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fe 26
Speaking of Bill's dalliances, some rando at a party tried to push that whole "Hillary attacked women" claim so I rattled off a list of names asking if she attacked them and he said yes to each one, it was funny. He believed she physically attacked each one of them. The list was Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, Arianne Martell (a character from George R. R. Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" series), Monica Lewinsky, and Tricia McMillan (from "Hitchhiker's Guide"). I always forget about that other chick. Broderick?
Yes, Hillary is going to do everything!Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Round#4 is out. https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/786184297199702022
Uhh, yes? After looking at everything I don't think Wilson did anything wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
I know, but look how the media and progressives painted that. It's the hypocrisy I have an issue with.
20 mins of the 90 min debate repeated questions on pussy grabbing. 20 mins which could have been dedicated to 4 questions from the audience. That shit show was 90% of 90+ mins of two people yelling at each other and some moderators exerting the power they had to push their agenda rather than moderate the tone of the debate to give a voice to audience who was there for a town hall.
If that's not enough to piss me off, I get in the car every morning to turn on NPR and hear more pussy grabbing.
Pussy grabbing is not going to effect the government or the US people. Hillary's unapologetic double standards and secretiveness will.
I wish I could say that the press should be talking more about Trump's policies than his pussy-grabbing, but he has none to speak of. He doesn't even know what his own VP is thinking. Clinton has answers but they're so blah and fake.
https://twitter.com/Jzokun/status/78...360060416?s=09
This might be my favorite thing to come out of this entire election.
"No, wait, no, okay, so it's not Jaws. It's Rocky, okay. This election is Rocky and Trump is Rocky with his work ethic and traditional American values, and Hillary is Apollo Creed, an arrogant, monied member of the establishment wi-...what? Oka-no, wait-I-
"Look, no, sure any analogy can-... All I'm saying is that Trump and the true Republicans left in his camp are fighters, and Trump is leading his loyal army just like King Leonidas lead the brave 300."
Megyn Kelly spot singing Lady of Spain? Amazing.Quote:
Originally Posted by A Robot Bit Me
Trump is Biff from BTTF2 and Hillary is Mr Burns. Bernie was Marty McFly.
Trump is Stannis Baratheon and Clinton is Ramsay Bolton.
- He adopts a new religion after years worshiping other gods, but he does so as a means to an end. He doesn't believe any of it beyond it helping him to win the Iron Throne.
- He begins doing things that others view as insane in his quest, due mainly to this new religion. However, despite what a lot of people say, he gains followers who like him because he's tough and strong.
- He launches a failed attempt to take over King's Landing, defeated by the Lannisters. The Lannisters are a rich and old family who nobody really likes but lets them rule because they can't do anything about it.
- He nurses his wounds and plans to take over the North via Winterfell, a place held by the psychotic Bolton family. The Boltons are known for their cruelty, even going so far as to flay their enemies. Ramsay Bolton sics his ravenous dogs on people and generally gets away with everything, much to the dismay of everyone around him.
- He grows stronger by helping the Night's Watch, who patrol the Wall to keep people out of Westeros.
- As he marches on Winterfell, Stannis is beset by all kinds of missteps and bad luck. Ramsay sneaks into his camp and sabotages it, causing defections.
- In an attempt to gain the upper hand over the Boltons, Stannis sacrifices his own daughter in the name of the religion he doesn't truly believe in. This whittles his force down to a very small amount of faithful people.
- He makes it to Winterfell with what seems like a plan, only to see Ramsay Bolton come at him with a fucking cavalry phalanx. He loses epically.
So the question is, who is our Jon Snow?
I guess I posted that in the wrong thread. Oh well.Quote:
Originally Posted by A Robot Bit Me
BernieQuote:
Originally Posted by Calliander
Your mother.Quote:
Originally Posted by Calliander
lolQuote:
On Tuesday when Bill O'Reilly told him that "you're behind with women," Trump responded, "I'm not sure I believe it. I'm not sure I believe it."
Cartman is real.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-IFcCY0m3E
Some Trump supporters tweet to repeal the 19th amendment, as some polls show he would win overwhelmingly if only men voted. Hilarious.
lol.
They should go one step further and repeal the voting rights of the uncircumcised. "No vote if you have any foreskin in the game!"
Eliminate a bunch of minorities that way.
well, blacks were 3/5 of a vote before, so that's coming soon
Yeah, no.Quote:
Originally Posted by kingoffighters
Correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh
I'm surprised he didn't say something like, "More like I'm hovering creepily behind them, amirite?"Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolemite
Anybody else feeling the slightest bit ill reading various comment sections around the internet today where regular American people are attacking the women who came forward to accuse Trump?
I get ill reading the comment sections around the internet every day.
Can someone explain to me the right's whining about the "ransom" paid to Iran for the release of American prisoners?
1 year ago:
- Iran deal is made.
- Republicans criticize the deal, one complaint being that there was no provision for the release of the prisoners tied to the unfreezing of Iranian assets.
- Republicans are mad that the prisoners weren't freed as part of the exchange for the money and lifting of sanctions.
1 year later:
- The prisoners appear to have been freed in exchange for the money and lifting of sanctions.
- Republicans are mad that the prisoners were freed as part of the exchange for the money and lifting of sanctions.
So they got exactly what they asked for, but now they don't want it?
They saw how well changing positions worked for Hillary.
Russian War Boy
You're applying logic where none exists. I'll be interested to see what they do after this election.Quote:
Originally Posted by A Robot Bit Me
Also: it's Iran's money, we stiffed them on an agreement a while back.
If we stiffed them, it's not theirs anymore. Neener neener.
Well it's been sitting in a bank account earning interest, presumably to use as a bargaining chip at some future time.
Tnl really doesn't want to talk about hillary getting us into a war.
Which one? A current one, or a future-possible? I have thoughts on both.
Russia has been pulling the covers to their side of the bed lately. Very uncomfortable.
This article is important for two reasons: 1) it's a visual sign of the climate change, 2) it's a literal sign the media is anti-intellectual (natural death is a thing, you hyperbolic tool)
https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ophe-laid-bare
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/tnl/att...chmentid=79581
To be fair, I think it's just clickbait. The actual articles all contained the full quote in context, and I do think there's a problem with how he phrased what he said, but no one was mislead into thinking he said anything other than what he did.
Everyone thought he literally said veterans with PTSD weren't strong. That seems like people were mislead to me. This isn't a case of the three white people on Twitter complaining about Luke Cage, either.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frogacuda
Those headlines were massively disingenuous and dishonest. Those headlines are written knowing nobody reads the articles.
I don't think that sort of thing is considered acceptable journalistic practice, but all rules out the window to get an sick, corrupt woman in the Oval Office.
I get that trump is an ogre but the media shilling for HRC has really been a bad look this cycle.
It's embarrassing, because for a decade I've dismissed Fox News/Rush claims that the media had a liberal bias. Now, the DNC/Podesta emails have exposed a close relationship between Hillary's camp /the DNC and NBC, CNN, Huffpost (not a surprise, but still), and even Politico. I understand the lure of money and viewership, but at the cost of dishonesty and alienating 40-50% of the nation?
People love dem echo chambers.
Well yeah, but most of this was general whining and it didn't look good considering that Fox has that same type of relationship.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
Of course, MSNBC & Fox News are blatant partisan networks, just like Briatbart is a blatant Alt-Right voice box. You expect the others to try to be objective. Instead, we see "friendlies" writing back in forth with the DNC on how to write a story.
Click for full size
(Yes, it's real.)
That's pretty awesome.
One Muslim dude attacking a random cop with a machete is a terror plot. Three white dudes stockpiling weapons for an organized attack on a community of Somali immigrants, plans to release a manifesto after, and aimed to "wake the people up" who are facing domestic terror charges ?
That's a militia plot, silly!
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2016...4992f8577f.jpg
Just a reg'lar olé attack:
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2016...1c11e9fd13.jpg
*sniff sniff*
Yes as long as we only ever use the word terrorist to describe Muslims then terrorism is an exclusively Muslim problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by A Robot Bit Me
When your story can't generate controversy, create it.
The plebeians can not read emails.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=7DcATG9Qy_A
Wow.
jack and shit
He tweeted out three encrypted keys right around the same time.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...mp-trolls.html
Not me, I promise.
Nice report to distract from the real emails.
Like the one where Podesta confirms every right winger's long held theory that Dems wish these mass shooters were white instead of Arab.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...ardino-shooter
What was Tim Kaine's response to this?
RUSSIA!
of course not, some of it is funny.
Stupid Diff, responding before you could get this in.Quote:
Originally Posted by Some Stupid Japanese Name
Sorry King Internet. sha256sum codes. Is that better?Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
Bruh, all those pings from Texas are me. and half the ones from China
Redmond sure does spend a lot of time attacking Ann Arbor.
a ping is an attack!
Is the Trump TV backup plan starting? Donald's son in law, “Jared ... is a snaky little motherfucker, a horrible human being,” has been seen on the move.
Rest in peace, Julian Assange.
Whether I agreed with your methods or not, you didn't deserve to be killed by Obama in hand-to-hand combat on the streets of London.
You definitely didn't deserve to have your body unceremoniously thrown from a chopper into the Bristol Channel, with the M60 gunner emptying an entire belt of ammunition into you as you fell.
And it was definitely abhorrent for Hillary to moon your body as you floated there, prior to sinking. You will be missed.
RIP homie.
More Alex Jones Conspiracy Nonsense
Man, wouldn't it be glorious if Trump dropped out and it was Hillary and Johnson? Her losing to a third party would be even better than her losing to trump.
:lol: good luck
Uhh Johnson is a kooky weirdo with implausible ideas and absolutely no backbone.
Bernie was the obvious choice outside of Hillary.
I want Gar-bear to rein his nuts in, win AZ or NM, that single, bald Mormon CIA op to win Utah, then the election get forced to the House, who hands it to Newt as one last fuck you to Clinton.
Johnson doesn't want a minimum wage. Good luck there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
What you guys aren't seeing is that Johnson is a white male that is less hated than Trump or Hillary.
That is really all it would take at this point. have a dick and not enrage people.
Couldn't happen. The House would vote on the three candidates with the most electoral votes, so Gingrich isn't a possibility. Johnson doesn't have a shot at that, but McMuffin does have a shot at taking Utah. Add in a slight Trump resurgence, just enough that neither he nor Clinton makes it to 270. House Republicans could choose to support Trump, or give it to the guy who won a lone state. Or, given their penchant for dysfunction, Clinton somehow comes out on top.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
Then things get really screwy, as the Senate votes for VP separately. We could end up with a Clinton-Pence administration.
I wonder how few states Trump is actually going to get at this point.
I wonder how many nations Hillary is going to bomb at this point.
